DJI Mavic 4 Pro vs The Gauntlet: ActiveTrack Sports Follow-Me Testing

The DJI Mavic 4 Pro is different from most of the other sports-tracking drones I’ve tested over the past year (such as the DJI Neo, HoverAir X1 Pro, and DJI Flip). Those drones don’t really care about their own safety while flying. They don’t have forward obstacle avoidance during tracking, and instead, aim to precisely follow your path, hoping that by mimicking it, it’ll keep them alive. Sometimes that works. And if it doesn’t, they’re designed to be crashed hundreds of times (well, some of them are anyways…).

Whereas the Mavic 4 Pro is a beast, primarily in terms of size. But also technology inside. It’s got new lidar capabilities to detect tiny branches, even in total darkness. It’s got 6 additional cameras for obstacle avoidance (plus two sensors for ground detection). In many ways, it’s more like the DJI drones of the past when it comes to ActiveTrack than the newer generation of YOLOing mini sports drones. The question is: Can it bridge the gap and be both?

Obviously, I set out to put that to the test, as always.

In this video, I put my DJI Mavic 4 Pro through The Gauntlet and all its stages, to see how well it handles. Both in terms of obstacle avoidance (and crashes), as well as image quality, and the cameras that you’re allowed to use in ActiveTrack mode.

To see how well this drone holds up, hit the play button up above. Even if you don’t care about drones, I suspect you’ll find it entertaining.

Thanks for watching!

FOUND THIS POST USEFUL? SUPPORT THE SITE!

Hopefully, you found this post useful. The website is really a labor of love, so please consider becoming a DC RAINMAKER Supporter. This gets you an ad-free experience, and access to our (mostly) bi-monthly behind-the-scenes video series of “Shed Talkin’”.

Support DCRainMaker - Shop on Amazon

Otherwise, perhaps consider using the below link if shopping on Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. It doesn’t cost you anything extra, but your purchases help support this website a lot. It could simply be buying toilet paper, or this pizza oven we use and love.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar, which works here on DCR and across the web.

Click here to Subscribe without commenting

Add a picture

*

8 Comments

  1. Pavel Vishniakov

    It’s interesting to see that the better obstacle avoidance drones get, the more cautious they become. Not even in terms of going into tight spaces, but doing predefined maneuvers in the open as well.

    And regarding the part where the drone flies around the tree and picks up in via active track again – is it a sheer coincidence or can it really leverage the remote for ActiveTrack? If not, looks like a missed opportunity for DJI, given the stable and fast wireless connection between the drone and the remote as well as GPS on both devices.

    • It’s hard to say. I agree, it could be sheer coincidence, but in none of my other ActiveTrack tests did it do that. But I agree, it continues to be silly how they handle it.

      I’ve gotta believe at this point it’s because they thought the RC Track would have released last fall, and thus been the proper upsell for these scenarios. But alas, not yet.

  2. Asa

    Thanks for reviewing the 4 Pro and look forward to additional testing. It’s on my short list of tools after owning the 2 Pro for many years for use in getting cool event footage, and other photo/video shooting for my business.

    The type of tracking you did in this test seems like the wrong tool for the job, but glad you put it through its paces…for science. For something this costly, I’m glad it protected itself well and seemed to do as well as some of the smaller drones you use more often for your cycling footage.

    I find this drone to be more of a flying camera than something more quick/agile that’s used for sports, high speed flying, etc. With the zoom, updated controller software, and other goodies, it looks like a winner! I’ll have to look up the spec, but does it have a higher top speed than it’s predecessors based on its body design?

  3. Leo M

    Great video! I appreciate these gauntlet videos, because they tell us a lot about how these things will handle obstacles, in a real world setting. I’ve ordered on in the US, but have a feeling I’ll be waiting a while!

    PS: Any inkling of when your Roam3/etc. review will pop? Thanks!

  4. ArT

    What a huge device !

  5. Kostya Sav

    So did they finally beat obstacle avoidance capabilities of the Skydio R1?

    • LyricDuffel

      Chinese products will never beat western supremacist ones.

    • I’d argue at this point DJI & Hover are beating Skydio in the consumer tracking market. As always, we humans have rose-tinted glasses about things in the past, Skydio included. Skydio was hardly perfect, I killed a few of them, including hitting trees it shouldn’t have.

      But more importantly, Skydio’s consumer products were limited to a 1-meter bubble around the drone (in all directions), making it very tough to do anything like we saw in this video, or with DJI’s yolo-drones like the NEO & Flip, which don’t care about obstacle avoidance in ActiveTrack. And to that extent, the NEO/FLIP follow objects tracks *FAR* better than Skydio’s consumer products did. Like, not even same realm close.

      And that’s all before we talk about the camera side, which Skydio’s consumer products were not awesome, especially in color/lighting (let alone the dodge/weave). At the time though, I always noted how it was a tradeoff between a drone that tracked awesome (for it’s time), versus a good camera.

      Ironically, we still have that tradeoff, it’s just that Hover and the DJI NEO/Flip have largely replaced the Skydio for tracking, yet have crap cameras.