AmazFit has just announced the new Active 2, a smartwatch at $99 (or $129 for the Premium model with a sapphire screen and [vegan] leather strap). Otherwise, both watches feature identical software features – and for $99, as is usually the case with AmazFit, the feature list is impressive.
The 1.32” AMOLED display-laden watch includes 164 sport modes, full mapping (with ski maps), barometric altimeter, voice control, NFC Payment via Curve, and plenty more. Many of these features mirror what are seen on their high-end watch, the AmazFit T-Rex 3 (for $234USD), that I just reviewed a few days ago. Of course equally, some of those features seem a bit unpolished once you start digging into them. But at $99, that lack of polish can probably be overlooked.
Now this isn’t a review at this point, just a quick hands-on look at things. While AmazFit has just unlocked being the first company to correctly send me a package from the US to Mallorca without customs jail, it unfortunately got sideswiped/delayed by Spanish holidays on this end, so Mr. FedEx just came this morning. Nonetheless, I figured I’d give you the details for now.
What’s New & Specs:
Ok, so here’s what’s notable/new on the AmazFit Active 2 compared to the existing Active 1:
– Switched from rectangular design to a round/circular design
– Increased display brightness to 2,000 nits (that’s very high)
– Increased display resolution/size to 1.32” & 466x366px
– Added terrain maps, ski maps
– Added support for Bluetooth sport sensors (including power meters, heart rate sensors, cadence/speed sensors)
– Added barometric altimeter
– Added ambient light sensor
– Added strength movement & rep counting
– Added 40 new sport modes including skiing, stair climbing, golf swinging (total 164 sport modes)
– Added NFC payments via Curve (Zepp Pay)
– Smartwatch battery life claim of “up to 10 days”
– GPS battery life claim of “up to 21 hours”
– 5ATM/50m water resistance level
– Touchscreen with two dedicated buttons
– Microphone for voice commands
– $99 for the base model, $129 for the premium model
And that’s just the new stuff, at a quick high-level, it supports basically all of the typical AmazFit/Zepp features, including:
– Daily Activity Tracking
– Sleep tracking (with phases/stages)
– Structured workout creation/execution from app
– On-demand interval creation via watch
– Track Running recognition
– Virtual Pacer
– 164 sport modes including Bobsled, Checkers, and Tug-of-War (Wingsuit is not in this model)
Got all that? Good. If not, the full list of 164 sport modes are located here.
Hands-On Quick Look:
First up, the box. No big surprises here. This box is the Premium edition for $129, which includes both the vegan-leather strap as well as a secondary sport strap.
I actually quite like the feel of both bands, kudos on this. Not sure how a company can get this right for $129, yet plenty of others charge 5x that much for lesser plastic straps.
The bands do appear to use standard band attachments, so you can swap out to whatever you want, as usual. Meanwhile, the charger is just an adapter for your own USB-C cable. This is different than the T-Rex 3, and I presume also different from the rectangular Active 1.
Ok, looking at the UI basics, it has two buttons and the touchscreen. Long-time followers know I’m a button guy, so while I’d much prefer 4-5 buttons, these work. The upper right button acts as an escape/back button, and the lower right is confirmation (basically opposite Garmin). However, the touch screen is very much needed for many operations, such as tapping ‘Go’ on a workout.
Backing up though, here’s the watch face:
If you swipe down from the top, you’ll find all your settings.
If you tap the upper right, you’ll get a list of all the apps you can finger around in:
And then equally, if you tap lower right, you’ll get a list of all the sport modes:
You can tap open a sport mode to start it, such as Run, which will fire up the GPS.
As with their other watches, you can customize data fields for that sport mode on the watch itself (though not on the smartphone app), up to 6 data fields per custom page. Very solid.
This area is also where you’d load up a route to follow (either imported file or Komoot, though that’s kinda messy, as I showed in my T-Rex 3 review a few days ago).
As noted, the device supports maps, and I was able to download my map pretty easily, though, it took a little bit via Bluetooth. There is no WiFi on this device, and somewhat oddly, you can’t load an area smaller than 30KM x 47KM. Like, you can’t make the box smaller (just bigger).
So to download the above map took about 3-4 minutes. Not horrible.
Unfortunately, like the T-Rex 3, the maps in this area are all wonky. Some portions of dry land show as water, albeit water is usually water, and…thus well…the maps are mostly useless for me. This seems to be a problem with more than just me, as others have been reporting it in various areas for months.
That said, assuming the maps in your area load correctly, and you’ve sent a route to it, then you’re good to go for basic turn-by-turn route following.
Pivoting slightly, in the settings you can pair up Bluetooth sensors, including power meters. This is new to the Active 2 compared to the Active 1.
Setting sports side, here’s a few more pretty pictures of the watch. The look and feel is nice, and gives off a solid polished vibe. Not too heavy, but not too light.
Again, if you want to see how the rest of the features work, check out my T-Rex 3 video/post from two days ago, since everything else is identical and quite current given that was all filmed/shot in the past few days on the same app/platform.
Wrap-Up:
As I said in the intro, the features here are super impressive for the price. If we compare it to other things in that price ballpark, such as the Fitbit Charge 6 (usually floating around $99), this obviously has a boatload more features and functionality. Like, cargo-ship vs paddle-boat level more functionality. And since the Fitbit Charge 6 requires you to choose between accurate GPS or accurate HR, this almost certainly wouldn’t do that based on my other AmazFit testing, assuming they didn’t solidly break anything. Of course, sometimes companies do – so more testing is ahead.
Still, the fact that AmazFit can deliver all of these features is mind-boggling. Especially the mapping pieces (setting aside the water rendering quirk). That’s something that’s missing from the $500 Garmin Instinct 3 that just launched yesterday, a fact that can’t easily be overlooked for an endurance sports watch. Whereas this very-not-endurance sports watch has it.
Nonetheless, as I said in my T-Rex 3 review, I hope that AmazFit understands that if they can spend a bit more time on polish of the software features, it’d go a long way. In a quick ‘Hands-on’ piece like this, the AmazFit units tend to be super impressive. But once you start using those features, the quirks are endless. No cycling power data to Strava, weird understanding issues with the voice assistant, cumbersome navigation process, etc… The list goes on.
So again, if AmazFit can focus on that a bit, then they’ll very quickly start to make inroads against multiple companies in this space. But software details matter just as much as incredible hardware specs. Here’s to hoping!
With that – thanks for reading!
FOUND THIS POST USEFUL? SUPPORT THE SITE!
Hopefully, you found this post useful. The website is really a labor of love, so please consider becoming a DC RAINMAKER Supporter. This gets you an ad-free experience, and access to our (mostly) bi-monthly behind-the-scenes video series of “Shed Talkin’”.
Support DCRainMaker - Shop on Amazon
Otherwise, perhaps consider using the below link if shopping on Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. It doesn’t cost you anything extra, but your purchases help support this website a lot. It could simply be buying toilet paper, or this pizza oven we use and love.
Are contactless payments now available in the U.S.?
A quick comment on Amazfit as a former customer. I purchased an Amazfit Stratos. I was very impressed with the feel and function of the watch and it performed very well doing my first 70.3 triathlon.
My problems began with warranty support. The first time the watch failed at the 6 month mark it took about a dozen emails for them to honour their 1 year warranty. They initially blamed me on getting the watch wet (a multisport watched designed for SWIMMING). Once they finally replaced it, the new watch failed within 2 months (complete black screen). Despite all my efforts they refused to honour their one-year warranty.
Unless they have made significant improvements in quality/durability AND customer service… I would not even consider purchasing.
No wingsuit profile, no purchase for me
Space diving is also missing: link to en.wikipedia.org
I’ve seen friends with Amazfit watches having their races not recorded because of some bugs on their watches. I’ve never had a core functionality fail on one of my Garmins, I’d rather pay 5x and have my watch work when it needs to. It will take me years to reconsider Amazfit.
And I have never had an Amazfit fail to record any activity. I do not rely on auto-detection, ever.
I have been using Amazfit since 2018. I have owned 4. All but the first one works, and it only recently failed after 6 years of ownership. Value pricing with a rich feature set.
I would never choose this watch, but the fact you can get 10 of them for one Fenix 8 shows the hardware is not exactly expensive at this point. Question is then if Garmins software work / development effort is worth additional 900 bucks (i know i am exaggerating here).
Kinda wanted a watch to track football (soccer) games to see distance and HR for a while but have never been able to justify the cost of other GPS equiped watches previously. I have a head unit for my bike already so it would be fairly single use. This has got me interested.
Vegan leather is plastic and has none of the qualities of real leather, can we stop pandering to this marketing nonsense?
Leather is a premium material, pleather is just fancy plastic. It’s like saying the shell of the watch is made from warm titanium, it’s just a different material in every way.
Actually, vegan leather can be all assortment of plant materials too.
I have no idea what exactly is in this, but it certainly doesn’t feel like plastic. It feels pretty close to real leather.
You know I’m the last person to go down the marketing drain, but this is far closer to leather than not.
Don’t get me wrong, you have to use the terms the manufacturers do, Im not suggesting otherwise. This stuff drives me crazy though, it’s pure virtue signalling and marketing. Maybe it’s not plastic but I’m confident it won’t age like leather which improves with time and rarely wears out (ultimate sustainability, given it’s a byproduct!).
We’re perfectly capable of coming up with new names, vegans shouldn’t need to use leather and bacon, call it what it is!
It’s just a name to facilitate identification, but I’m ok with that, let’s call leather bovine skin from now on
Does it track hrv? And is it compatible with stryd? (Trex is, according your review)
If it claimed to track HRV, would you trust it?
Yes, it tracks HRV. I don’t know for certain on Stryd, but I’d assume it’s the same.
In that case, I would be interested to know how it compares to other devices ;-)
I’m the T-Rex review ray mentioned that it provides values similar to competitors. If the active 2 shares de hw, there is a chance that it does behave well.
Cool thanks for the info
I had an Amazfit Bip S just to play around with. Tiny. GPS (no maps). OHR. Long battery life. As Ray points out, pretty unpolished/limited software compared to Garmin. But, c’mon! This watch was something like $49 list and I got it on a discount – maybe $30? Super, super impressive in terms of capabilities for the price. I don’t know that I’d have trusted the recording of my A races to it (sold it a bit ago), but used it mostly for running during travel. But I would have run a training 5k / 10k with it, no worries. WRT the Active 2, I also think that the appearance is super attractive and another positive characteristic in this price range.
30$ extra for sapphire glass, this is amazing.
I don’t see how other watch manufacturer can sell X00$ watch with gorilla glass or equivalent.
I had any Amazfit Stratos years back. Solid experience for low cost, switched to garmin Fenix after 2 years. Last year I won a Amazfit Cheetah Round and I am impressed. In direct comparision I find it acurate, stable and reliable. A lot of updates…
I think I’m going to try this for the navigation function. I currently use an Ultra with locust maps. It almost works perfectly and the app barely uses battery. I went on an 8 hour hike. I was left with 75% on the watch with turn-by-turn directions. The problem is something is not right with Samsung’s compass. My maps are always upside down. Locust, like Google maps, has auto rotate. Some apps don’t. Regardless, I think it still screws with the turning directions on locust because that is usually off. Also locust does require the phone to store maps.
I think I’ll try this and compare the two simultaneously. It doesn’t matter if the water color isn’t accurate. I just need the gpx route function with onboard maps.
I’m very excited to see how products like this perform once the EU cracks open Apple’s locked down Watch APIs. As a Watch SE 1st Gen owner who didn’t get WatchOS 11, this would be a pretty interesting option, plus it’s round.
That chess profile is exactly what I needed to switch from Garmin to AmazFit. 🤣
In all fairness, you can create a chess profile on Garmin.