Most headlines today will tout the new Pixel Watch 3 finally being available in a secondary larger 45mm size. And indeed, that’s a big deal. It’s no longer the tiny little watch the first two generations of Pixel watch were. However, in many ways, that’s actually not the most important new thing on the Pixel Watch 3 – at least for sports and fitness people.
Instead, it’s the dramatic new focus on training load, readiness, running features, and much more when it comes to sports and fitness. Even more so, it’s a huge shift for the accompanying Fitbit app that drives much of that experience. The app has radically shifted from being one that felt constrained to its long history of overly simplifying metrics, to an app that seems to bridge the gap towards what an athlete might actually want.
Which isn’t to say it’s trying to be a Garmin/Suunto/Polar/etc watch, but rather it’s trying to compete more directly with what the likes of Apple and Samsung have offered in recent years around sports-specific training functionality.
Note I’ve had some hands-on time with the watches, as well as an entire day with the engineers behind it, and also an actual run with the watch. Ultimately though, this is not a review. Not even close. That’ll come down the road in September when the watches get released, and I can properly test all the features.
Let’s dive into it!
What’s New & Key Specs:
Dividing things up, let’s look at what’s new in hardware and in software. Starting with the hardware bits, here’s what’s new:
– Adds 45mm size case (41mm display is 32.2mm across & 408px, 45mm display is 36.2mm across & 456px, previous 41mm was 30.48mm & 384px)
– Changed from AMOLED to AMOLED-LTPO, which adds/enables dynamic refresh rates
– Adds variable refresh rate from 1hz to 60hz
– Increased max brightness from 1,000 nits to 2,000 nits, decreased min brightness to 1 nit
– Increased battery life up to 36hrs in new battery saver mode (24hrs in always-on display mode)
– Increased/faster charging times by 20%, or 15 mins faster than before
– Made improvements/changes to dual-chipset architecture (one core for ambient compute, one for performance compute)
– 35% bigger battery in 45mm than the 41mm (but screen burns more, obviously, so times are essentially a wash between units)
But the real changes are largely on the software side, so quickly looking into that before I get into the details down below:
– Upgraded to Wear OS 5 (the operating system/platform)
– Improved heart rate accuracy via algorithm, especially for running
– Added new automatic bedtime mode to detect if you fell asleep and lower power/battery burn
– Added new workout builder on both watch and revamped Fitbit app
– Added structured workout support on watch (including realtime guidance during run)
– Added media controls inside of the workout itself
– Added running efficiency metrics, including ground contact time, vertical oscillation, form analysis, cadence, and stride length
– Added support for all those efficiency metrics within Fitbit app on phone
– Added new running-focused dashboard in Fitbit Mobile app (tons of new analytics, very runner-focused, more down below)
– Added PR tracking (e.g., fastest 5KM/10KM/etc…)
– Added offline Google Maps support to watch
– Added new Cardio Load and Target load features (training load concepts see below, this is a huge line item)
– Revamped Daily Readiness Score concepts (more explained below)
– Daily Readiness Score is now available for all users, not just Fitbit Premium
– Added Morning Brief report on watch upon wakeup (akin to Morning Report/etc on other watches)
– Adding no-pulse emergency alerts and notifications (if it detects your pulse has stopped)
– Minor improvements in heart rate broadcasting compatibility (to 3rd party apps/devices)
– Added Google Nest Camera live view, including responding via Mic
– Added Google TV Remote (using watch as TV remote control)
– Added Pixel UWB phone unlock, and car unlock (from watch)
– Added ability to pick up and hold calls from watch (Pixel Phones)
– Added Find My Phone from watch (Pixel Phones)
– Added Pixel Recorder App (audio recorder) for phone
– Revamped Pixel Phone camera controls from watch
Now, there are some new Fitbit Premium items in here, though it’s notable that *EVERYTHING* listed above is totally free on the Pixel Watch. Instead, Fitbit is slowly shifting Fitbit Premium as before more of the advanced recommendations side of things, rather than in the past where it was restricting looking at basic historical data. I’ll dive more into this in the review, but based on my first look pieces, at Google, the additive pieces here are really more about suggested future things you could do, rather than restricting seeing your own data. In any event, a few new things on Fitbit Premium:
– Shifting to Google AI Gen9 models underneath
– Will now create daily run recommendations, including an LLM-generated description of the run
– Will use your Readiness Score and Training load metrics to drive those run recommendations
– Will leverage long-run preferences (specified in the watch) to schedule workouts
– Will determine your optimal target heart rates for each workout
Again, this section is a bit thin at this point, I’ll have more on this as I start seeing it in real-life longer term.
And finally, here’s the prices below, with all of these being on pre-order as of today, with availability September 10th.
– 41mm: $349 for WiFi, $449 for LTE edition
– 45mm: $399 for WiFi, $499 for LTE edition
And because I’ve got some photos, here’s some pictures of the boxes (which, like many companies, are now made fully of recycled materials, and also recyclable themselves with no plastic inside):
Ok, with that, let’s dive into the units.
A Bigger Watch:
This will be the shortest section, cause frankly, it’s just not that complicated: The watch is bigger.
Obviously though, it’s not super big. It’s “just” a 45mm watch, which is essentially on par with other companies in the mainstream watch category, including Samsung (40/44mm), Garmin (41/45), and Apple (41/45mm). It is not, however, going to feel the same as something like an Apple/Samsung Watch Ultra or a larger Garmin 47/51mm watch. But the key thing for me wearing it for some time, including a run, is that it just felt ‘normal’. Whereas before, the 41mm Pixel Watch on my wrist felt “simply too small”. That’s now been rectified.
(The two sizes side by side, in two colors: 41mm and 45mm)
Thus with that size increase, Google has solved, by far, the single biggest complaint about the Pixel Watch. It’s simply no longer a factor in my thinking about the device. Of course, I think it’s also fair to say that the industry trend going forward from all these companies is offering a much bigger size/battery size watch, in that 47-52mm range. Obviously that’s not happening this year, and certainly Google isn’t going to say what’s going to happen next year, but I’d think given Google’s Pixel product lineup has always leaned more heavily on the tech-forward adopter, not having a larger-sized watch for 2025 would probably be a big miss. But for this year, I’m just happy to see the 45mm mainstream offering.
In addition to being bigger, it also gives Google a bit more room in a handful of pages to add more data metrics, or icons, or more ‘stuff’ in a single view. Here’s an example of that:
Now, one area to briefly touch on is the new screen. This new screen is now twice as bright as before, going up to 2,000 nits, but now also goes down to 1-nit for the lowest level brightness (Google won’t say how low the lowest brightness level was previously). However, more important than that is the new AMOLED-LTPO screen which has a variable refresh rate, from 60Hz for smoother animations, down to 1Hz (once a second) for battery saving. Google says it’s this new screen that they’re seeing the biggest battery savings from.
Here’s a shot showing the slightly larger screen sizes of the 41mm compared to the Pixel Watch 2, and the 45mm.
Additionally, they’ve added a new battery saver mode for up to 36hrs of battery. That new battery saver mode won’t impact any health metrics (which will still record at every-second), as well as will keep all safety components on. Instead, it’ll turn off the alway-on display and limit background calls. Gesture raise-to-wake remains on though.
Further, they’ve added a new ‘Auto Bedtime Mode’, which means if you fall asleep on the couch watching TV, it’ll kick into a lower power saving mode, while also going into bedtime mode. None of this changes how they do sleep tracking itself, but rather is more about lowering power demands from the watch if you’ve fallen asleep.
Training Load & Readiness:
As noted above, I’d argue the biggest changes to the Pixel Watch 3 are the ones in software, not hardware. And while Google is focusing heavily on the change around running (both in terms of accuracy as well as running-specific features), I’m going to start with changes that are more broad, but still equally deep. This is a complete revamp of the Fitbit Daily Readiness features, as well as new training load features (called Cardio Load and Target load).
First up, there’s the new Readiness Score. I say ‘new’, because Fitbit has changed the Daily Readiness score to seemingly just be called ‘Readiness’, and with it, removed some components from the score. The removal of the components are less about removing them, and more about moving them into a different bucket. Also, notably, the new Readiness is now free for everyone, with no subscription required for anyone anymore (including all existing Pixel Watch users, and Fitbit users will also get a score update).
As for the Readiness Score, the new score now uses HRV, the past two weeks of sleep (with a weighted average built around a sleep reservoir concept), and your resting heart rate. It no longer takes into account previous day ‘activity’, whereas resting HR wasn’t previously part of it. The reason for the changes is they want the updated Readiness Score to be more about how you’re feeling generally, rather than athletically. That’s because the athletic side is now counted for in Cardio/Target load. Your Readiness Score is still on a 1-100 scale (with 100 being most ready).
Here you can see three very different days, and the factors that contributed to each day:
And you can also look at Daily Readiness levels over time too (another area their competitors should copy):
Next are the big new pieces: Cardio Load and Target Load.
Cardio Load is measuring workout intensity over time, specifically it’s looking at your 7-day cardio load versus your 28-day load. It takes into account heart-rate-driven intensity and duration. However interestingly, it’s not limited to you starting a workout. It’ll capture a very busy day walking around the city (where you didn’t press start on a workout), and give credit for that (whereas virtually no other company does). It’ll then give you one of three color-coded cardio load values, along with six different labels. Here’s an example of this showing the current cardio load at 142, along with the coloring as green and “Above Target”. The green color meaning that while it’s above target, it’s not crazy-high above to be concerning. You can trend this over time as well.
And one more showing how that trends over time:
And here’s how that’d look on the watch, within that tile:
Next then is Target Load. This requires 14-days of calibration, and 7 nights of sleep. As always, the data will get better the longer that period, up to the 28-day historical load range. Target Load is telling you how much your body is ready to take on that day, based on your historical data.
Critically though, you can specify whether you want to ‘Maintain’ or ‘Improve’ your current load levels. In other words, unlike every other watch that just assumes you want to forever-increase, Google actually is the only company that gives you the option to decide whether you want to simply maintain (such as in the off-season), or want to improve fitness (such as leading up to an event). This is actually a really big deal that could be easily overlooked/missed.
The target load for each day is given as a range, and you can see this in a few places, but perhaps my favorite is actually showing how you score each day against your Cardio Load:
You can display these metrics in a number of places. Google has a full tile on the watch (as seen above), as well as a Cardio Load complication available for watch faces. Further, there’s a huge slate of details within the app.
As with most other endurance sports watches, you’ll see the exact numbers above/below your load levels, as well as your trend information. As I said in my recent first look at Apple’s Training Load beta for WatchOS11, you really need those numbers to add scale. Google/Fitbit seems to have found a way to deliver training load that doesn’t become overly complex like many endurance sports watches, but concurrently, doesn’t become a bit too washed-over like WatchOS10 (look Apple, you’ve still got a month or so to add some labels to those charts, making many of us instantly happy).
Overall, I’m really impressed with Google’s first go at this. It’s much better than I expected, and again, seems to thread the needle very well between overly complex, versus too fuzzy. Good job.
Oh, one last thing in this category, is the new ‘Morning Brief’ page, which appears when you wake up each morning, akin to morning report on other devices. This will show your HRV values from the night prior, your Readiness Score, your Target Load for the day, sleep, weather, and more.
Further, if there’s any of your overnight metrics that have a warning, it’ll notify you here. This includes HRV, SpO2, Breathing Rate, Skin Temperature, and Resting Heart Rate.
Running Features Expansion:
Next up, we’ve got a slate of new running-related features. In short, these are:
– Added creation of structured workouts on both app and watch
– Added real-time guidance of run structured workouts
– Added advanced running metrics (e.g., ground contact time, vertical oscillation/etc…)
– Added running form analysis
– Added new ‘Run’ Dashboard/section within Fitbit app
– Added tracking of personal running records (e.g., fastest 5KM/etc..)
– Added daily suggested running workouts (with Fitbit Premium) to watch
– Revamped the living crap out of the Fitbit app to make it actually useful for athletes
So starting off on the structured workout side, you can now build structured workouts, with specific targets in the Fitbit App, as well as on the watch itself. These workouts can have specified warm-up/cooldown sections, as well as various targets and repeat intervals. You can get reasonably complex here, and you can pretty easily create the common targets you’d want for most structured running workouts I can think of wanting to suffer through. And hopefully, you can do this on both app or watch.
If you created it on the app, it instantly shows up on the watch (literally, like 1 second later in my hands-on time). And you can have multiple structured workouts available on the watch.
Once you select the workout, you can go out and execute it. It’ll automatically iterate through each step of the workout, showing you the exact targets for each piece and giving you a quick countdown into each segment. For the most part, this is all basically the same as most other companies. But it worked perfectly for the single hands-on structured workout I did:
Of course, the above photo mid-run isn’t super helpful, so here’s what it looks like otherwise:
Note again, this isn’t a review. It’s just an initial first-look at things. A full review will come around the same time as the watch releases to the public on September 10th.
Also of note is that at this point, there isn’t any sort of tie-in to other structured workout platforms, like TrainingPeaks. We saw Apple add that last year, bringing them closer to endurance sports companies. When I asked Google about this, it definitely wasn’t off the table, instead opting for “no news to share on that today”, which is what they usually say when they aren’t quite ready to talk about something that didn’t make the cut for release day announcements.
Now post-run, you’ll get a slate of stats on the watch, but also more importantly in the Fitbit app. On the watch, for example, you can see each portion of my structured workout, and the average pace/HR for that portion:
As I alluded to above, there’s been a *MASSIVE* refresh of this app. It’s hard to overstate how big a change this is. Previously, the Fitbit app has always been targeted towards its core audience of daily step/activity/wellness tracking. It felt watered down and constrained by that goal. But now, it’s full of useful running stats/metrics. Is it the depth of Garmin? No, but it’s pretty darn useful now. Here’s some initial stats from my run (more down below further). Note the Cardio Load listed on the left panel.
Which brings us to that refreshed running dashboard. Here you can slice and dice runs across various longer durations including weekly, monthly, 3-months, yearly, etc… I show it a bit more during the video, as it’s really more about the sorting/filtering flexibility as you dive into each metric.
And in that entire bundle of things, you may have noticed those new advanced running metrics. Specifically Ground Contact Time, Vertical Oscillation, Stride Length, and Cadence. You can see these on the watch post-run (but not within a run):
And then far more details in the Fitbit App afterwards, as well as do some kinda-basic analysis of them:
And you can overlay/compare metrics, as well as trend things over longer periods of time (note below right, the ‘Ground Contact Time’ option is checked, to show how that changes over a 3-month period).
If you’ve got Fitbit Premium, it’ll also give you a bit more insights, saying things like “Runs over the last week have a 15% higher cadence”.
Fitbit gave me a tour of their lab, where they validated all of these metrics using sensor plates, a huge array of cameras, and more. I’ll dive into that in my full review, as well as comparisons to other companies’ data. Though, I’ll point out that my comparison efforts will be somewhat limited in that Google isn’t exporting any of this data to open-file standards (or exporting it at all). Thus, no matter how much they’ve invested in ensuring the accuracy, I don’t really have a good way of demonstrating or validating that myself.
On the flip side, one thing that will be easy to validate, is Google’s new claims of being their “most accurate heart rate for running” watch to date. While the company says the sensor is almost identical to before, the majority of the changes are coming from algorithm updates. And these updates are coming to both Pixel Watch 1 and Pixel Watch 2 owners.
Again, this is an area I’ll dive into during my in-depth review down the road, looking at both the heart rate accuracy in running, as well as various changes they’ve made around GPS/GNSS accuracy. Notably, the Pixel Watch 3 doesn’t include dual-frequency/multiband GPS/GNSS. However, as I’ve constantly said: I don’t care how a company arrives hardware-wise at an accurate GPS track, as long as they do so. We’ve seen companies with multiband implementations do worse than other companies without multiband. So as long as Google can deliver accurate GPS tracks, I’m happy. Again, things for the full review.
Wrap-Up:
Ultimately, Google has made a gigantic step forward here. Sure, most importantly, they delivered on a larger-sized watch, more in line with much of the male population (while also keeping the smaller-sized). But beyond that, they’ve delivered on the groundwork for a huge slate of fitness and sports features. They’re adding in key (free) things that make it compete quite directly with not just Apple/Garmin/etc, but also with the likes of Whoop and Oura.
Redefining the already solid Daily Readiness and adding the Cardio Load/Cardio Target is very much an affront to paid subscription services like Whoop that have become popular in recent years. Except that Google’s optical HR sensor has historically been quite strong, so assuming my testing of the Pixel Watch 3 comes in with at least that level accuracy, that’ll give them a solid step-up over some of those other workout-focused platforms.
Which isn’t to say there aren’t some obvious gaps. For a sport-focused device with training load-type metrics, the lack of integration with platforms like TrainingPeaks is a notable gap. It seems like that might be on the horizon, but hopefully it’s something they can make move a bit faster. And then certainly as we move towards 2025 and beyond, I think Google has to add a larger watch akin to the 49-51mm watches of Apple/Garmin/Samsung, which have become popular not just for their size, but larger battery life. But hey, let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
First, there will be testing of the Pixel Watch 3 for a proper in-depth review, thus, stay tuned for that in early September.
With that – thanks for reading!
Found This Post Useful? Support The Site!
At the end of the day, I’m an athlete just like you looking for the most detail possible on a new purchase. These posts generally take a lot of time to put together, so if you're shopping for the Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) or any other accessory items, please consider using the affiliate links below! As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. It doesn’t cost you anything extra, but your purchases help support this website a lot.
And of course – you can always sign-up to be a DCR Supporter! That gets you an ad-free DCR, access to the DCR Quarantine Corner video series packed with behind the scenes tidbits...and it also makes you awesome. And being awesome is what it’s all about!
Any idea if the structured workouts for running are coming to the Pixel Watch 1 or 2? Been very underwhelmed with the Pixel Watch 1’s running offerings. Not good. At all. Any run over 1 hr has a 50-50 chance of being correctly recorded.
Using fitbit? I agree totally on the 50-50 chance. Using 3rd party app SportWerks? Never a problem. I’m hoping that Ray’s optimism is reason to believe that fb is finally listening to athletes and making their app something other than the POS that it has been since the first PW hit the shelves.
I’ll get a clearer list of what is or isn’t going back to Pixel Watch 1/2. I know for certain that all of the Readiness updates are going to everyone across the board (Fitbit and Pixel).
We had chatted about it a bit while I was there, but getting that final list fell off the plate a bit.
Ray, I am very (pleasantly) surprised to hear you speak so positively of Google’s efforts on the software side of things. Fitbit app on the PW has been total garbage and I have used a much better third-party app for all of my workout tracking. Two of the most important features are multiple data screens with variable fields (e.g., “three value screen”, which has very large numbers, easily read while running) and the ability to automatically export workouts to TrainingPeaks and/or Strava. You touched on the latter above as a “maybe coming a bit later” but I didn’t see any mention of the former. Can you adjust the data screens in any way to make the numbers big and readable? The pics above show screens that I have no problem reading as I sit here at my PC and type this; however, running down the road, I would surely struggle with them, even with the 45 model. Thanks for a great first look!
I’m an aging runner so I know I’m not their target market, so to speak. My eyes simply can’t read the screen very well while bounding along! That’s one thing that I love about my 3rd party app: not only does it have great big numbers for me, it also has some great voice guidance telling me my HR every minute, my split time every lap, etc. I find that I don’t NEED to look at my watch nearly as often because of this. If the “new” fb has either of these two, it would be a huge improvement over what they put out so far with the first two iterations of the PW.
I think there’s always going to be two factors to readability:
1) Size of the numbers
2) Display clarity/brightness
In this case, both of these improve. While I’ve long said that 1,000 nits (even in bright sun) is almost always more than enough for AMOLED displays, there can be off-angle cases where more brightness helps. Likewise, it’s a much bigger screen, and thus much bigger numbers.
I had no problems seeing it, even in that bright sunny mid-summer California sun (obviously, taking a photo with a GoPro didn’t turn out awesome mid-run).
I’ll dig more into data field customization options in the review though, but I don’t think there was any secondary option for making the text bigger (ala Garmin’s new ‘big’ mode).
If I’m not mistaken, that capability did exist, just not native in the fitbit app. I have read of many who used this but it was not important to me so I have not done it myself to verify it.
Yeah, there was a third party app in the Play store. But I see no reason why the watch shouldn’t do that natively – the hardware is there, and a native integration is presumably more reliable and battery friendly.
In good news, “Heart rate on exercise equipment” is listed as a feature (hidden in the “compare” tab on the Google store).
Hoping to see some real world tests about how well this works in the real world, with things like a wahoo bolt or a tablet running zwift or rouvy.
Correct, broadcasting was actually added last year to Pixel Watch. But, as noted in my review, it was hyper-flakey because Google/Fitbit went with the secured/authenticated broadcast of HR, versus the more normal open broadcast of HR. It’s one of those things that sounds great if you ask a consumer, but in reality, just sucks in terms of compatibility/implementation/etc…
I asked them about that specifically, and they noted they spent a bunch of time over the past year improving that across the board. It’s something I’ll definitely be trying in my review, to see how it handles.
After getting mine. It works with my karoo 2. But constantly needs to be re paired. For whatever reason there’s no way to save it to the equipment list on the watch.
Same issue with Wahoo, pairing works, broadcast is stable and Google lists Wahoo as tested and compatible, but having to re-pair each time is not a great experience.
Hey, Ray. Are you able to transmit your location from the LTE watch without the BT connection to the phone? In other words, can I go for a walk without my phone, with my family getting an accurate measurement from the Google Maps “share real-time location” feature? link to support.google.com
Interested to see how the new feature set compares to Garmin.
My Pixel Watch 2 had a line appear on the screen so had to get a replacement one. In the meantime I switched to a Garmin 265 and loved the simplicity of it and the running features and guidance, but miss the UI and feel of the Pixel Watch. I think this year is a big step up and I’m not so sure if I would have made the move had these features been there in the first place.
Which is another question. The processor is the same. I get the screen is improved for battery life, but could we not see all these main metrics come over to the Pixel Watch 2?
Interested to see how close feature wise these are to Garmin, to make an informed choice about my next watch, whenever that may be.
They noted specifically in meetings changes to the dual chipset processors…which, obviously, doesn’t ultimately match the differences on those spec sheets. 🤷
Thanks for the hands-on!
I’ve a question re structured workouts: can PW also read instructions to connected headphones/read aloud? Or is it all just text on the watch?
Not natively, but it looks like you could use this 3rd party app, per Stryd’s page on it (since that was for WearOS 4, I’m sure it’ll work for WearOS 5): link to help.stryd.com
“That’ll come down the road in September when the watches get reviewed” For the Fenix 8 comparison? Does seem like the Fenix 8 release (assuming current leaks of vendors publishing details early) is a bit different from previous releases in that the high end watch is never fully new. The cpu in the Fenix 7 was what ran the 945LTE and some functionality was in the Venu 2. Each watch always seemed a bit iterative but only the Marq has stuff in it not seen in the Fenix/epix pro
Is there is a possibility to see the run results on a computer screen?
You mention it can be seen on the watch and on the app on the phone, but a good analysis might need a bigger screen. Decent run analysis I do on a computer screen, not the phone. Is that also possible here with the Pixel?
This watch is then totally unusable for more serieus runners I’d say. But tell me if I’m wrong.
I was triggered by your remarks that the app is now better suited for athletes (e.g; “… an app that seems to bridge the gap towards what an athlete might actually want.”
So I digged in deeper, might be an interesting watch for me.
But no, decent analysis of runs can not be done, because the watch maker does not provide a tool (anymore, as I understand from your reaction above – why?) for analysing on an appropriate platform like computer screen + keyboard, which is necessary.
But moreover: it doesn’t have integration with running analysis tools, like TrainingPeaks. So you can’t even use other, dedicated services for running analysis !?.
@Ray: can you, in your final review, state in which extend this watch can be used by a bit serieus running athletes? Thanks!
I think there’s a reality though that many people are using other platforms (e.g. Strava, TrainingPeaks, etc…) to do that analysis though. And then as most companies tell me these days, for most consumers, it’s mobile-first for post-workout stats (which this has). For coaches, they’re definitely going to be more tied to web/desktop variants, but that too is covered by TrainingPeaks/etc…
Realistically, Fitbit’s existing web platform was never awesome for analysis of endurance workouts. My only usage for it (ever) was exporting stuff.
You can (it’s actually how I get data out now, via Strava).
The main thing that they aren’t doing today is sending the full running dynamics/efficiency metrics. Those are staying inside the Fitbit platform.
I’m hoping they’ll start sending those added metrics outside, but I’m also concurrently aware that very few external platforms support them anyways, and frankly, even fewer coaches/athletes care about them. :-/
I’m pleased to see the interval notifications. I’m not a serious runner, mostly for health. I’ve logged about 1K miles on PW1 and 2 without this feature but it’s something I’ve missed from my Suunto.
Can the exercise display be customized? Analyzing cadence after the fact is useful but adding it to the real-time display is even more so.
Nice review as always. For me, the bigger and brighter makes lot of sense. I also like that trimmed the bezel.
Meanwhile, Ray I sent you a message, seems you didn’t see it.
I stay in Nigeria and I run a YouTube channel (link in profile) where I post how to guides on smartwatches. I need to do some videos on the Galaxy Watch 7 but I don’t have finances to do that. I lost most of my earnings with the March Core update.
I am pleading Ray, if you can LOAN me the Galaxy Watch 7 and Ultra. I will do my videos within 1 month, sell off the watches and send you back your money. I Promise! I am very very trustworthy.
If you have any doubt, I can make you the admin on the channel until you receive your money.
I really need this help, thank you in anticipation.
Great intro to the Pixel 3. I’m looking forward to the big review later in the ear. If possible covering in pool swimming metrics would be great especially tracking interval times and interval pace on watch in pool. For info, I’ve attached the rest screen I have with my Garmin Fenix 7 which for the moment is the King of swimming data. It gives me all the info I need between rest intervals / sets (also track turn-around time). Plus I can toggle between manual and auto start (which is not always accurate). Stroke detection spot on.
Great early overview! As a trail runner, my biggest frustration testing the PW1 and PW2 has been loss of GPS. Without accurate connected GPS all other metrics are off – current pace per mile, total distance, etc. I was really hoping to see Google upgrade to multi-band. Looking forward to seeing your full review in September.
I have a Pixel Watch 2. Recently I started track running. There is no option for track running or did I miss something. How to use Fitbit for short sprints?
Between this and the AW, it really puzzles me how Garmin does not really include some features and statistics on the Venue 3 (which is supposed to rival those).
I never owned a fitbit but your description about the eco system and new Cardio Load and readiness features are really looking nice. My main problem with all platforms was thate imported workouts from other platforms are not included in these calculation.
Do you know, if fitbit will take account of activities not recorded by any fitbit device to their training stats and calculations?
I don’t understand the “Find My Phone” part of the announcement. My PW1 has “Find My Phone”, and it doesn’t care if it’s a Pixel phone or something else (mine is a Z Fold 5, and the feature works just fine).
I’m interested in replacing a forerunner with Pixel watch 3, but I need the battery to last around 4 hours with GPS on, with Bluetooth headphones/HR monitor on, and with music on. It sounds like it will struggle – does anyone have experience?
I ran about 1:08 with LTE on, music streaming from Spotify, Samsung earbuds pro 3 connected with bluetooth. The battery dropped from 43% to 8%…Quit disappointing. However, next time I will try to put LTE off and download beforhand my run library from spotify.
I wanted to second the interest Charles G expressed in the Pixel 3 swimming metrics. I use an AW, which seems accurate and meets my pretty basic data requirements for swimming, and a Whoop strap, which is wildly inaccurate recording HR in the pool — and at the beginning of runs, where it always records a non-existent spike. A watch that could record basic swimming data and provide a Readiness score is very tantalizing.
I’m interested in replacing a forerunner with Pixel watch 3, but I need the battery to last around 4 hours with GPS on, with Bluetooth headphones/HR monitor on, and with music on. It sounds like it will struggle – does anyone have experience?
How does that work and is it also available in the 1st gen watch? I tried a third party app to stream to my cycling computer. Put have to pair them new every time, as it wouldn’t connect successfully without pairing it freshly
I recently received my PW3. Was pleased that the running activity had several new metrics that could be displayed during the exercise. AND one ife those is indeed cadence. The addition of mileage cues was also very welcome.
Retrox question is different. They’re asking if you can connect external HR straps/etc to the Pixel Watch (in cases where the Pixel Watch HR isn’t working, or, if you wanted to mount the watch to your handlebars/etc). Same goes for external cycling sensors.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t. That is however different than HR broadcasting, which the Pixel watch is the device sending out the signal, which, it does.
Oh you’re right, totally misread that – dunno what benefit having an additional HR sensor would have with the pixel watch doing it on board anyways, didn’t think that would be something anyone would want to do.
I like the enhanced suite of running analytics, but I must say that I don’t find the Pixel watch 3’s heart rate monitor to be any more accurate that the Pixel 2’s. During the first mile of a run, when I am running quite slowly to warm up, the Pixel 2 used to show my heart rate spiking to a very high level, (a level that I can’t reach even when running intervals, and which is never corroborated by my Polar heart rate strap monitor, which shows a much lower heart rate) and then, over the next couple of miles, the heart rate settles down to a more credible level. The Pixel watch 3 shows exactly the same pattern of heart rate. Quite disappointing.
Out of curiosity, how snug are you wearing the band/strap? And, where are you wearing it?
You want to ensure it’s not over the top of the wrist bone (ideally bout 1″/3cm up the arm from the wrist bone), and for workout usage, it should be snug enough that you couldn’t slide a pencil under the band (with any ease).
I wear the watch about a finger width up from the wrist bone and when I work out, I tighten it up a notch from the tightness level at which I wear it normally. It’s tight, but not so tight that it’s uncomfortable. I definitely would not be able to slide a pencil under the watch when I am working out.
Did you experience some troubles with the pace chart ? I swapped my first PW3 thinking that it was defective, but I realize that this issue is redoundant. I set the GPS autorization for Fitbit on “always” to be sure. Nothing changed. Any clue wbout these pace drops ?
I swim, bike and run. Then, I come here and write about my adventures. It’s as simple as that. Most of the time. If you’re new around these parts, here’s the long version of my story.
You'll support the site, and get ad-free DCR! Plus, you'll be more awesome. Click above for all the details. Oh, and you can sign-up for the newsletter here!
Here’s how to save!
Wanna save some cash and support the site? These companies help support the site! With Backcountry.com or Competitive Cyclist with either the coupon code DCRAINMAKER for first time users saving 15% on applicable products.
You can also pick-up tons of gear at REI via these links, which is a long-time supporter as well:
Alternatively, for everything else on the planet, simply buy your goods from Amazon via the link below and I get a tiny bit back as an Amazon Associate. No cost to you, easy as pie!
You can use the above link for any Amazon country and it (should) automatically redirect to your local Amazon site.
Want to compare the features of each product, down to the nitty-gritty? No problem, the product comparison data is constantly updated with new products and new features added to old products!
Wanna create comparison chart graphs just like I do for GPS, heart rate, power meters and more? No problem, here's the platform I use - you can too!
Think my written reviews are deep? You should check out my videos. I take things to a whole new level of interactive depth!
Smart Trainers Buyers Guide: Looking at a smart trainer this winter? I cover all the units to buy (and avoid) for indoor training. The good, the bad, and the ugly.
Check out
my weekly podcast - with DesFit, which is packed with both gadget and non-gadget goodness!
Get all your awesome DC Rainmaker gear here!
FAQ’s
I have built an extensive list of my most frequently asked questions. Below are the most popular.
You probably stumbled upon here looking for a review of a sports gadget. If you’re trying to decide which unit to buy – check out my in-depth reviews section. Some reviews are over 60 pages long when printed out, with hundreds of photos! I aim to leave no stone unturned.
I travel a fair bit, both for work and for fun. Here’s a bunch of random trip reports and daily trip-logs that I’ve put together and posted. I’ve sorted it all by world geography, in an attempt to make it easy to figure out where I’ve been.
The most common question I receive outside of the “what’s the best GPS watch for me” variant, are photography-esq based. So in efforts to combat the amount of emails I need to sort through on a daily basis, I’ve complied this “My Photography Gear” post for your curious minds (including drones & action cams!)! It’s a nice break from the day-to-day sports-tech talk, and I hope you get something out of it!
Many readers stumble into my website in search of information on the latest and greatest sports tech products. But at the end of the day, you might just be wondering “What does Ray use when not testing new products?”. So here is the most up to date list of products I like and fit the bill for me and my training needs best! DC Rainmaker 2023 swim, bike, run, and general gear list. But wait, are you a female and feel like these things might not apply to you? If that’s the case (but certainly not saying my choices aren’t good for women), and you just want to see a different gear junkies “picks”, check out The Girl’s Gear Guide too.
Any idea if the structured workouts for running are coming to the Pixel Watch 1 or 2? Been very underwhelmed with the Pixel Watch 1’s running offerings. Not good. At all. Any run over 1 hr has a 50-50 chance of being correctly recorded.
Using fitbit? I agree totally on the 50-50 chance. Using 3rd party app SportWerks? Never a problem. I’m hoping that Ray’s optimism is reason to believe that fb is finally listening to athletes and making their app something other than the POS that it has been since the first PW hit the shelves.
I had issues with GPS dropping out.
I hope there’s good support for heart rate monitors, too now.
I’ll get a clearer list of what is or isn’t going back to Pixel Watch 1/2. I know for certain that all of the Readiness updates are going to everyone across the board (Fitbit and Pixel).
We had chatted about it a bit while I was there, but getting that final list fell off the plate a bit.
Ray, I am very (pleasantly) surprised to hear you speak so positively of Google’s efforts on the software side of things. Fitbit app on the PW has been total garbage and I have used a much better third-party app for all of my workout tracking. Two of the most important features are multiple data screens with variable fields (e.g., “three value screen”, which has very large numbers, easily read while running) and the ability to automatically export workouts to TrainingPeaks and/or Strava. You touched on the latter above as a “maybe coming a bit later” but I didn’t see any mention of the former. Can you adjust the data screens in any way to make the numbers big and readable? The pics above show screens that I have no problem reading as I sit here at my PC and type this; however, running down the road, I would surely struggle with them, even with the 45 model. Thanks for a great first look!
I had a Pixel Watch 2 and found the screens pretty readable, so I think they’ll be even better on a smaller bezel and bigger screen.
I’m an aging runner so I know I’m not their target market, so to speak. My eyes simply can’t read the screen very well while bounding along! That’s one thing that I love about my 3rd party app: not only does it have great big numbers for me, it also has some great voice guidance telling me my HR every minute, my split time every lap, etc. I find that I don’t NEED to look at my watch nearly as often because of this. If the “new” fb has either of these two, it would be a huge improvement over what they put out so far with the first two iterations of the PW.
I think there’s always going to be two factors to readability:
1) Size of the numbers
2) Display clarity/brightness
In this case, both of these improve. While I’ve long said that 1,000 nits (even in bright sun) is almost always more than enough for AMOLED displays, there can be off-angle cases where more brightness helps. Likewise, it’s a much bigger screen, and thus much bigger numbers.
I had no problems seeing it, even in that bright sunny mid-summer California sun (obviously, taking a photo with a GoPro didn’t turn out awesome mid-run).
I’ll dig more into data field customization options in the review though, but I don’t think there was any secondary option for making the text bigger (ala Garmin’s new ‘big’ mode).
So it can finally broadcast the heart rate to external devices (like a bike computer)? The lack of this was a deal breaker for me in past iterations…
If I’m not mistaken, that capability did exist, just not native in the fitbit app. I have read of many who used this but it was not important to me so I have not done it myself to verify it.
Yeah, there was a third party app in the Play store. But I see no reason why the watch shouldn’t do that natively – the hardware is there, and a native integration is presumably more reliable and battery friendly.
In good news, “Heart rate on exercise equipment” is listed as a feature (hidden in the “compare” tab on the Google store).
Hoping to see some real world tests about how well this works in the real world, with things like a wahoo bolt or a tablet running zwift or rouvy.
Correct, broadcasting was actually added last year to Pixel Watch. But, as noted in my review, it was hyper-flakey because Google/Fitbit went with the secured/authenticated broadcast of HR, versus the more normal open broadcast of HR. It’s one of those things that sounds great if you ask a consumer, but in reality, just sucks in terms of compatibility/implementation/etc…
I asked them about that specifically, and they noted they spent a bunch of time over the past year improving that across the board. It’s something I’ll definitely be trying in my review, to see how it handles.
After getting mine. It works with my karoo 2. But constantly needs to be re paired. For whatever reason there’s no way to save it to the equipment list on the watch.
Same issue with Wahoo, pairing works, broadcast is stable and Google lists Wahoo as tested and compatible, but having to re-pair each time is not a great experience.
PW3 45mm Sept 5, 2024 update
Wahoo Bolt 2 WA55-17028
link to support.google.com
Hey, Ray. Are you able to transmit your location from the LTE watch without the BT connection to the phone? In other words, can I go for a walk without my phone, with my family getting an accurate measurement from the Google Maps “share real-time location” feature? link to support.google.com
Yes, it should work totally on LTE. Last year the watches I had were tied to US LTE, versus Euro LTE, so I wasn’t able to test as much back home.
Interested to see how the new feature set compares to Garmin.
My Pixel Watch 2 had a line appear on the screen so had to get a replacement one. In the meantime I switched to a Garmin 265 and loved the simplicity of it and the running features and guidance, but miss the UI and feel of the Pixel Watch. I think this year is a big step up and I’m not so sure if I would have made the move had these features been there in the first place.
Which is another question. The processor is the same. I get the screen is improved for battery life, but could we not see all these main metrics come over to the Pixel Watch 2?
Interested to see how close feature wise these are to Garmin, to make an informed choice about my next watch, whenever that may be.
I’ll get a list of which features are coming versus not.
The processor (well, two of them) is actually different here, FWIW.
Same cpu it looks like:
link to support.google.com
different names on the spec sheet but the same thing:
link to qualcomm.com
Maybe they are really bad at tech specs?
They noted specifically in meetings changes to the dual chipset processors…which, obviously, doesn’t ultimately match the differences on those spec sheets. 🤷
Thanks for the hands-on!
I’ve a question re structured workouts: can PW also read instructions to connected headphones/read aloud? Or is it all just text on the watch?
I’ll play around there. I went back to my GoPro footage to see if I could hear the prompts, but it was a bit windy, so hard to hear.
Thanks Ray, much appreciated!
Are these new features in the Fitbit app available for the Charge 6? Or do you need a PW to see the new Readiness score
The new Readiness Score will come to the existing Fitbit devices, I assume tied to roughly Sept 10th.
I’ll get clarity on that.
This could be potentially really big if comes to all devices, could really improve FitBit. If only they would allow sync to Apple Health…
Thanks
No native power yet, do you (anyone) know if the Stryd pos will pair withthe Pixel 3?
Not natively, but it looks like you could use this 3rd party app, per Stryd’s page on it (since that was for WearOS 4, I’m sure it’ll work for WearOS 5): link to help.stryd.com
“That’ll come down the road in September when the watches get reviewed” For the Fenix 8 comparison? Does seem like the Fenix 8 release (assuming current leaks of vendors publishing details early) is a bit different from previous releases in that the high end watch is never fully new. The cpu in the Fenix 7 was what ran the 945LTE and some functionality was in the Venu 2. Each watch always seemed a bit iterative but only the Marq has stuff in it not seen in the Fenix/epix pro
I think Sept when the watches get reviewed meaning when he receives his pixel watches.
Leaks have certainly slowed on Fenix front but will be interesting
Is there is a possibility to see the run results on a computer screen?
You mention it can be seen on the watch and on the app on the phone, but a good analysis might need a bigger screen. Decent run analysis I do on a computer screen, not the phone. Is that also possible here with the Pixel?
Ugh.
Up until your question, I hadn’t noticed that apparently as of July 8th, 2024, the Fitbit Web Dashboard is gone. :(
That’s where you could view all that stuff, as well as export it: link to community.fitbit.com
Hmm…now I need to see how to export stuff going forward.
This watch is then totally unusable for more serieus runners I’d say. But tell me if I’m wrong.
I was triggered by your remarks that the app is now better suited for athletes (e.g; “… an app that seems to bridge the gap towards what an athlete might actually want.”
So I digged in deeper, might be an interesting watch for me.
But no, decent analysis of runs can not be done, because the watch maker does not provide a tool (anymore, as I understand from your reaction above – why?) for analysing on an appropriate platform like computer screen + keyboard, which is necessary.
But moreover: it doesn’t have integration with running analysis tools, like TrainingPeaks. So you can’t even use other, dedicated services for running analysis !?.
@Ray: can you, in your final review, state in which extend this watch can be used by a bit serieus running athletes? Thanks!
I think there’s a reality though that many people are using other platforms (e.g. Strava, TrainingPeaks, etc…) to do that analysis though. And then as most companies tell me these days, for most consumers, it’s mobile-first for post-workout stats (which this has). For coaches, they’re definitely going to be more tied to web/desktop variants, but that too is covered by TrainingPeaks/etc…
Realistically, Fitbit’s existing web platform was never awesome for analysis of endurance workouts. My only usage for it (ever) was exporting stuff.
But grom your article I understood I ucan’t use these “other platforms (e.g. Strava, TrainingPeaks, etc…)” if I had this watch. Right?
You can (it’s actually how I get data out now, via Strava).
The main thing that they aren’t doing today is sending the full running dynamics/efficiency metrics. Those are staying inside the Fitbit platform.
I’m hoping they’ll start sending those added metrics outside, but I’m also concurrently aware that very few external platforms support them anyways, and frankly, even fewer coaches/athletes care about them. :-/
I’m pleased to see the interval notifications. I’m not a serious runner, mostly for health. I’ve logged about 1K miles on PW1 and 2 without this feature but it’s something I’ve missed from my Suunto.
Can the exercise display be customized? Analyzing cadence after the fact is useful but adding it to the real-time display is even more so.
Nice review as always. For me, the bigger and brighter makes lot of sense. I also like that trimmed the bezel.
Meanwhile, Ray I sent you a message, seems you didn’t see it.
I stay in Nigeria and I run a YouTube channel (link in profile) where I post how to guides on smartwatches. I need to do some videos on the Galaxy Watch 7 but I don’t have finances to do that. I lost most of my earnings with the March Core update.
I am pleading Ray, if you can LOAN me the Galaxy Watch 7 and Ultra. I will do my videos within 1 month, sell off the watches and send you back your money. I Promise! I am very very trustworthy.
If you have any doubt, I can make you the admin on the channel until you receive your money.
I really need this help, thank you in anticipation.
Great intro to the Pixel 3. I’m looking forward to the big review later in the ear. If possible covering in pool swimming metrics would be great especially tracking interval times and interval pace on watch in pool. For info, I’ve attached the rest screen I have with my Garmin Fenix 7 which for the moment is the King of swimming data. It gives me all the info I need between rest intervals / sets (also track turn-around time). Plus I can toggle between manual and auto start (which is not always accurate). Stroke detection spot on.
Great early overview! As a trail runner, my biggest frustration testing the PW1 and PW2 has been loss of GPS. Without accurate connected GPS all other metrics are off – current pace per mile, total distance, etc. I was really hoping to see Google upgrade to multi-band. Looking forward to seeing your full review in September.
Does pixel watch 3 have on demand oxygen blood read? Spo02
Hi can you tell us something about the offline Maps feature did you get to test it?
Based on all the talk about larger size, I feel like I’m the only man on the planet with wrists small enough that the PW1 looks good.
I have a Pixel Watch 2. Recently I started track running. There is no option for track running or did I miss something. How to use Fitbit for short sprints?
I really dislike having non-standard straps on a watch.
Between this and the AW, it really puzzles me how Garmin does not really include some features and statistics on the Venue 3 (which is supposed to rival those).
Ray,
I never owned a fitbit but your description about the eco system and new Cardio Load and readiness features are really looking nice. My main problem with all platforms was thate imported workouts from other platforms are not included in these calculation.
Do you know, if fitbit will take account of activities not recorded by any fitbit device to their training stats and calculations?
Thank you in advance
Flo
I don’t understand the “Find My Phone” part of the announcement. My PW1 has “Find My Phone”, and it doesn’t care if it’s a Pixel phone or something else (mine is a Z Fold 5, and the feature works just fine).
I’m interested in replacing a forerunner with Pixel watch 3, but I need the battery to last around 4 hours with GPS on, with Bluetooth headphones/HR monitor on, and with music on. It sounds like it will struggle – does anyone have experience?
Hi Dave,
I ran about 1:08 with LTE on, music streaming from Spotify, Samsung earbuds pro 3 connected with bluetooth. The battery dropped from 43% to 8%…Quit disappointing. However, next time I will try to put LTE off and download beforhand my run library from spotify.
I wanted to second the interest Charles G expressed in the Pixel 3 swimming metrics. I use an AW, which seems accurate and meets my pretty basic data requirements for swimming, and a Whoop strap, which is wildly inaccurate recording HR in the pool — and at the beginning of runs, where it always records a non-existent spike. A watch that could record basic swimming data and provide a Readiness score is very tantalizing.
I’m interested in replacing a forerunner with Pixel watch 3, but I need the battery to last around 4 hours with GPS on, with Bluetooth headphones/HR monitor on, and with music on. It sounds like it will struggle – does anyone have experience?
How does that work and is it also available in the 1st gen watch? I tried a third party app to stream to my cycling computer. Put have to pair them new every time, as it wouldn’t connect successfully without pairing it freshly
I recently received my PW3. Was pleased that the running activity had several new metrics that could be displayed during the exercise. AND one ife those is indeed cadence. The addition of mileage cues was also very welcome.
Is there a possibility to connect with external HR Senors via BT?
No, unfortunately not.
Pw3 DOES support Bluetooth hr broadcasting. I’ve got it working with my karoo 2 with minimal issues
Hi Yogi-
Retrox question is different. They’re asking if you can connect external HR straps/etc to the Pixel Watch (in cases where the Pixel Watch HR isn’t working, or, if you wanted to mount the watch to your handlebars/etc). Same goes for external cycling sensors.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t. That is however different than HR broadcasting, which the Pixel watch is the device sending out the signal, which, it does.
Cheers
Oh you’re right, totally misread that – dunno what benefit having an additional HR sensor would have with the pixel watch doing it on board anyways, didn’t think that would be something anyone would want to do.
I like the enhanced suite of running analytics, but I must say that I don’t find the Pixel watch 3’s heart rate monitor to be any more accurate that the Pixel 2’s. During the first mile of a run, when I am running quite slowly to warm up, the Pixel 2 used to show my heart rate spiking to a very high level, (a level that I can’t reach even when running intervals, and which is never corroborated by my Polar heart rate strap monitor, which shows a much lower heart rate) and then, over the next couple of miles, the heart rate settles down to a more credible level. The Pixel watch 3 shows exactly the same pattern of heart rate. Quite disappointing.
Out of curiosity, how snug are you wearing the band/strap? And, where are you wearing it?
You want to ensure it’s not over the top of the wrist bone (ideally bout 1″/3cm up the arm from the wrist bone), and for workout usage, it should be snug enough that you couldn’t slide a pencil under the band (with any ease).
I wear the watch about a finger width up from the wrist bone and when I work out, I tighten it up a notch from the tightness level at which I wear it normally. It’s tight, but not so tight that it’s uncomfortable. I definitely would not be able to slide a pencil under the watch when I am working out.
Hi Ray,
Thanks for your fantastic review.
Did you experience some troubles with the pace chart ? I swapped my first PW3 thinking that it was defective, but I realize that this issue is redoundant. I set the GPS autorization for Fitbit on “always” to be sure. Nothing changed. Any clue wbout these pace drops ?