Heads up! Here’s your massive list of sports tech deals! This includes the Garmin Forerunner 965 for just $499, Garmin Epix for $449, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 Black Titanium for $735, the GoPro Hero 12 Black for $299, and plenty more! Go check out the full list here!
I’m DC RAINMAKER…
Here’s how to save!
Wanna save some cash and support the site? These companies help support the site! With Backcountry.com or Competitive Cyclist with either the coupon code DCRAINMAKER for first time users saving 15% on applicable products.
You can also pick-up tons of gear at REI via these links, which is a long-time supporter as well:
Alternatively, for everything else on the planet, simply buy your goods from Amazon via the link below and I get a tiny bit back as an Amazon Associate. No cost to you, easy as pie!
You can use the above link for any Amazon country and it (should) automatically redirect to your local Amazon site.
-
Check out my weekly podcast - with DesFit, which is packed with both gadget and non-gadget goodness!
-
5 Easy Steps To The Site
1
In Depth Product Reviews
You probably stumbled upon here looking for a review of a sports gadget. If you’re trying to decide which unit to buy – check out my in-depth reviews section. Some reviews are over 60 pages long when printed out, with hundreds of photos! I aim to leave no stone unturned.
2
Read My Sports Gadget Recommendations.
Here’s my most recent GPS watch guide here, and cycling GPS computers here. Plus there are smart trainers here, all in these guides cover almost every category of sports gadgets out there. Looking for the equipment I use day-to-day? I also just put together my complete ‘Gear I Use’ equipment list, from swim to bike to run and everything in between (plus a few extra things). And to compliment that, here’s The Girl’s (my wife’s) list. Enjoy, and thanks for stopping by!
3
Have some fun in the travel section.
I travel a fair bit, both for work and for fun. Here’s a bunch of random trip reports and daily trip-logs that I’ve put together and posted. I’ve sorted it all by world geography, in an attempt to make it easy to figure out where I’ve been.
4
My Photography Gear: The Cameras/Drones/Action Cams I Use Daily
The most common question I receive outside of the “what’s the best GPS watch for me” variant, are photography-esq based. So in efforts to combat the amount of emails I need to sort through on a daily basis, I’ve complied this “My Photography Gear” post for your curious minds (including drones & action cams!)! It’s a nice break from the day-to-day sports-tech talk, and I hope you get something out of it!
5
The Swim/Bike/Run Gear I Use List
Many readers stumble into my website in search of information on the latest and greatest sports tech products. But at the end of the day, you might just be wondering “What does Ray use when not testing new products?”. So here is the most up to date list of products I like and fit the bill for me and my training needs best! DC Rainmaker 2023 swim, bike, run, and general gear list. But wait, are you a female and feel like these things might not apply to you? If that’s the case (but certainly not saying my choices aren’t good for women), and you just want to see a different gear junkies “picks”, check out The Girl’s Gear Guide too.
Which section does Eric discuss getting off of OpenGL an onto a modern graphics platform?
Wow, some really nice commuting bikes in the zwift office.
Thanks, Ray, great interview. I tried a Zwift trial long ago and realized it wasn’t for me, but it’s nonetheless terrific to hear the perspective of such an important player in the industry. Far more generic platitudes that the Wahoo interview, but such is the talking style of most CEOs these days.
One platitude that jumped out was his insistence that growth will come as long as they focus on the customer. Maybe, but I do have my doubts whether the total addressable market really is as large as he and many other in this space think. Given the wave of sport tech downsizing and bankruptcies, it also seems plausible that we’re at indoor training saturation, resulting in a bunch of these companies just fighting over the same customers, with the marginal cost of adding each additional subscriber going vertical.
Re your doubts about the market size: If the size was much smaller, that’s something he could never answer truthfully in public outside of a congressional hearing. They’ve raised over $600 million, including from reputable “mainstream” investors, on their numbers.
Agree with your addressable market skepticism. I don’t think they can drill any deeper into cycling aficionados. New customer growth is going to come from people who aren’t familiar with FTP, etc.
Thanks for the interview! Couple interesting things between Eric’s usual marketing buzz word collection. Was this the first time he publicly said running and rowing are dead? At least people can stop asking about it now.
Fancy way of him saying that the current valuation is obviously significantly lower than when they raised that $450mil series C round. Would have been funny if he just answered “hell no!” to the question about opening the Ride to other platforms though.
One thing I’m curious about is a breakdown between departments of the 300 employees. It’s not a very high number if the subscriber numbers are accurate (revenue estimates would suggest a lower average number) but it would be cool to see how many people do what exactly. Definitely more reasonable than the 600-700 number from the past.
No opening up the Zwift virtual shift protocol…despite the suggested new openness…that is bad…but maybe understandable from a business perspective. Good to see that elite has found a better and open solution with the Square.
One million paid subscribers really? That’s around 20.000.000$ per month divided by said 300 employees gives an imaginary ~66.000$ to spend per employee per month. That seems plenty if the numbers are correct. If they keep marketing cost (and building etc) in check they might just be profitable and not need all those investors and their ROI demands…
My guess is that they are only leaving the door open a tiny crack with respect to opening the virtual shifting protocol to competitors in case the EU starts making noise about anti-competitive business practices. But my guess is that absent any regulatory pressure, opening the protocol won’t happen. Maybe they would be more amenable if it was just companies like Rouvy or Bkool which occupy different niches. But they probably would do almost anything to keep the protocol from being available to MyWhoosh.
With respect to the price hikes, the hardcore base isn’t likely to abandon the platform in any sizeable numbers. it is the more casual users that will walk. So it is an interesting tactic to offer cheap, easy to set up hardware (i.e. the Jet Black Victory) “hardwired” out of the box to work only with Zwift. Will that cheap hardware be enough to attract and/or maintain the base of casual users?
Could Eric have meant – 1mil paid unique subscribers since inception, not current subscribers?
I went to mywhoosh, 200 bucks per year is a bit too much for an app
My Zwift annual sub is up on November but I cancelled after announcement of the price hike so that it wouldn’t auto-renew and I could look and see if there are any coupons or deals come November.
There’s a Zwift bug that is inactivating people’s annual subscription before the time is up if they have cancelled and the other night I signed on to see that my account was not active. I had to send a message to support who was eventually able to credit my remaining months but since the ride I was signed up for was more than 25km, and I was going to have to wait for support to respond to my email, I decided to install and check out MyWhoosh.
The setup process (downloading something like 5gb of map data to my iPad) left something to be desired but once I finally got riding, it wasn’t bad. (not nearly the number of active riders as zwift but maybe that will change as people leave zwift from the 33% price increase). I think I could potentially use it if Zwift keeps raising prices with no discounts when my subscription ends.
Also too bad to read that Zwift is moving towards closed and proprietary compatibility for features and hardware, when the initial support for compatibility and industry standards is what made them successful.
So he’s basically saying third party apps compatibility is never coming. That’s really sad.
Especially because talking to companies at Eurobike they seemed to fully expect this to happen by the end of the year.
Since Eric is from Wall Street and is not good at industrial operations, otherwise Zwift would have already integrated hardware and software, and it would not be Wahoo’s turn to threaten him.
Yes, please.
I started using Zwift around 2017, mainly during the winter months. I greatly enjoyed it for a few years. I switched to Rouvy in 2023 for its augmented reality, something that i had been hoping Zwift would have done. Riding on real roads all around the world with real stuff happening is the next best thing to actually being out there.
FIRST, that app needs some proper optimisations, works quite slow and looks like a game from early 2000. is it written in JavaScript by some junior developers ??
Prioritize stability. I prefer worse graphics but stable racing.
Around 28:00 did he say the ORIGINAL Tron design was to use partner trainers?
And THEN they decided to simultaneously develop Tron with their own trainer?
His wording was very imprecise throughout so he didn’t come across as super frank, but assuming that’s an accurate story, how on earth is that a logical strategy?
Ultimately, that strategy isn’t actually much different than where they stand today. Even with Zwift Ride, at launch, it’s with a slightly re-branded version of a Wahoo KICKR CORE.
Remember, the Zwift Ride was developed with the assumption the Zwift Hub was the backend. It wasn’t till they settled the lawsuit with Zwift that they dropped the JetBlack variant, and then went with a barely rebranded KICKR CORE.
One also has to remember in the era that the Tron bike was developed, one of the big issues Zwift had was actually getting the trainer companies to move fast enough – specifically at the affordable end of the spectrum. It continued to be a legit issue until just after the height of COVID, and arguably, until Zwift themselves partnered with JetBlack for the Zwift Hub.
Zwift wouldn’t ever have been able to scale to global distribution for the Tron Bike (just like they don’t today for Zwift Ride). But by leaning into partners to distribute the frame + partner trainer, it’s an easier pitch (which…as the final notable, is precisely what they’re doing today with Wahoo, in certain geographies).
To add to that, the decision to try to build their own trainer was clearly one that the investors stood behind. If that had been a Zwift management decision, Eric wouldn’t be CEO anymore.
In 20/20 hindsight the correct move would have been to buy one of the hardware manufacturers pre Covid instead of using a lot of money/resources into their own development. No idea how seriously they considered that option before trying to do it on their own.
It is an interesting conundrum; reminds me of PCs moving away proprietary hardware. Ideally Zwift works simply (plug and play) on any reasonable hardware platform. Trying to keep a hold on proprietary hardware is an understandable intermediate step to get prices hardware prices down, and I did hear something about offloading it down the road. Higher equity values accrue to software and subscribers. It would be interesting to see the data Eric mentioned regarding the large, yet “untapped” market of cyclists.