Heads up! Here’s your massive list of sports tech deals! This includes the Garmin Forerunner 965 for just $499, Garmin Epix for $449, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 Black Titanium for $735, the GoPro Hero 12 Black for $299, and plenty more! Go check out the full list here!
I’m DC RAINMAKER…
I swim, bike and run. Then, I come here and write about my adventures. It’s as simple as that. Most of the time. If you’re new around these parts, here’s the long version of my story.
You'll support the site, and get ad-free DCR! Plus, you'll be more awesome. Click above for all the details. Oh, and you can sign-up for the newsletter here!
Here’s how to save!
Wanna save some cash and support the site? These companies help support the site! With Backcountry.com or Competitive Cyclist with either the coupon code DCRAINMAKER for first time users saving 15% on applicable products.
You can also pick-up tons of gear at REI via these links, which is a long-time supporter as well:Alternatively, for everything else on the planet, simply buy your goods from Amazon via the link below and I get a tiny bit back as an Amazon Associate. No cost to you, easy as pie!
You can use the above link for any Amazon country and it (should) automatically redirect to your local Amazon site.Want to compare the features of each product, down to the nitty-gritty? No problem, the product comparison data is constantly updated with new products and new features added to old products!
Wanna create comparison chart graphs just like I do for GPS, heart rate, power meters and more? No problem, here's the platform I use - you can too!
Think my written reviews are deep? You should check out my videos. I take things to a whole new level of interactive depth!
Smart Trainers Buyers Guide: Looking at a smart trainer this winter? I cover all the units to buy (and avoid) for indoor training. The good, the bad, and the ugly.
-
Check out my weekly podcast - with DesFit, which is packed with both gadget and non-gadget goodness!
Get all your awesome DC Rainmaker gear here!
FAQ’s
I have built an extensive list of my most frequently asked questions. Below are the most popular.
- Do you have a privacy policy posted?
- Why haven’t you yet released a review for XYZ product you mentioned months ago?
- Will you test our product before release?
- Are you willing to review or test beta products?
- Which trainer should I buy?
- Which GPS watch should I buy?
- I’m headed to Paris – what do you recommend for training or sightseeing?
- I’m headed to Washington DC – what do you recommend for training?
- I’m from out of the country and will be visiting the US, what’s the best triathlon shop in city XYZ?
- What kind of camera do you use?
-
5 Easy Steps To The Site
In Depth Product Reviews
You probably stumbled upon here looking for a review of a sports gadget. If you’re trying to decide which unit to buy – check out my in-depth reviews section. Some reviews are over 60 pages long when printed out, with hundreds of photos! I aim to leave no stone unturned.
Read My Sports Gadget Recommendations.
Here’s my most recent GPS watch guide here, and cycling GPS computers here. Plus there are smart trainers here, all in these guides cover almost every category of sports gadgets out there. Looking for the equipment I use day-to-day? I also just put together my complete ‘Gear I Use’ equipment list, from swim to bike to run and everything in between (plus a few extra things). And to compliment that, here’s The Girl’s (my wife’s) list. Enjoy, and thanks for stopping by!
Have some fun in the travel section.
I travel a fair bit, both for work and for fun. Here’s a bunch of random trip reports and daily trip-logs that I’ve put together and posted. I’ve sorted it all by world geography, in an attempt to make it easy to figure out where I’ve been.
My Photography Gear: The Cameras/Drones/Action Cams I Use Daily
The most common question I receive outside of the “what’s the best GPS watch for me” variant, are photography-esq based. So in efforts to combat the amount of emails I need to sort through on a daily basis, I’ve complied this “My Photography Gear” post for your curious minds (including drones & action cams!)! It’s a nice break from the day-to-day sports-tech talk, and I hope you get something out of it!
The Swim/Bike/Run Gear I Use List
Many readers stumble into my website in search of information on the latest and greatest sports tech products. But at the end of the day, you might just be wondering “What does Ray use when not testing new products?”. So here is the most up to date list of products I like and fit the bill for me and my training needs best! DC Rainmaker 2023 swim, bike, run, and general gear list. But wait, are you a female and feel like these things might not apply to you? If that’s the case (but certainly not saying my choices aren’t good for women), and you just want to see a different gear junkies “picks”, check out The Girl’s Gear Guide too.
first, thanks for the info.
I am a simple man. I Have no Polar Watch, no interest in buying outside Garmin ecosystem. I see a new review on DCR about a new Polar watch, i read it in full. I see a new article on Polar FW updates, i read it in full.
Am i crazy?
;)
I had the same thought..but about 1/2 through I stopped reading.
haha, I’m still using my Garmin FR35 as my daily watch so I’m surely not a potential customer, and I still read the whole thing.
You’re not alone :) Maybe we should start a support group.
Haha…thanks guys!
Hey Ray,
What do those four humps at the caseback do? I guess they will affect HR accuracy on the “bonely” wrists.
It’s part charging port, and part skin contact sensor. They were introduced back on the original Vantage V1/M1 series. In that case, accuracy was generally very good.
Polar changed their optical sensor pieces (not the bumps, but the other pieces) for the Grit X/V2/Grit X Pro, and in that case, I (along with virtually every other reviewer) has seen a decrease in accuracy unfrotunatey.
From a practical standpoint, and aside from the HW differences:
– What S/W updates will not be on the Grit x that are on the Grit X Pro? (The new watch faces? Tests? Recovery Pro?)
– Once the Firmware is updated, the only differences between the VV2 and the Grit X Pro is cosmetics?
So basically, the original Grit X isn’t getting is the cycling running, leg recovery test, orthostatic test, and the new reverse route features. Nor the elevation profile aspects pre/mid-route, or the Recovery Pro pieces from the V2. And finally, not the daylight or compass dashboards.
That is what I gather from Ray’s other post published today (on the Grit X Pro).
For VV2 and Grit X Pro, it is purely cosmetic, save 22m strap compatability out of the box for the Grit X Pro.
No, thats wrong, it isnt purely cosmetic!
The Grit X Pro has Saphire Glas and the V2 has Gorilla
The V2 has a lightsensor, the Grit X Pro doesn´t
Also I think, the software/firmware is different. I have big issues with sleeptracking with the Grit X Pro. No Problems with V2
Regards from Germany
Marc
What about the Vantage M2? It seems quite strange that since it has been released, almost no firmware updates or even new features have been released.
So Ant+ will never ever come to Polar watches?
That’s really up to Polar to decide. Best I understand it from various folks, the hardware is fully capable of it. It’s “merely” a software update.
(And yes, I fully understand merely is a lot of work.)
Garmin is likely causing a bunch for ant+ connectivity and Polar (along with Coros) are saying no thank you. Playing the long game of supporting more bluetooth channels eventually.
Except Polar and COROS both use ANT+ elsewhere. COROS already confirmed the only reason they didn’t put ANT+ on the Vertix 2 was that the combo chipset they were using for a different component didn’t have it, not because of any other reason.
Meanwhile, Polar rolled it out to new products (the Verity Sense) this past year.
The difference is the Verity Sense is an accessory not a watch. Polar is selling 80% of these watches to hikers, casual runners, gym goers, etc. If they don’t have to give a portion of those sales to Garmin that’s a win for them. The accessories are a different market for the more dedicated users so they need to include ant+.
I do think they should include ant+ on the high end watches as those are more for triathlon and cycling types.
The license is $0.08 per device. A lot of us with endless Bluetooth pairing woes on Vantage devices wish Polar would do the work and enable the ANT+ hardware. It’s there on the chip.
The only real reason I can think of is the amount of storage on these watches is pretty small and I wonder how much bloat adding support would add to the code and the SoC load while in an activity…
I’ve more or less decided to move to Garmin when UK gets the 945LTE or future 955
I think that the reason is basically limited development resources, which forces Polar to be super selective. It feels like they have chosen not to actively go after cyclists as they have not updated their bike computers for a really long time.
In addition, if you look at their support for power meters and trainers via Bluetooth, this has also been spotty for a long time. My Kickr Core reported wrong power numbers for the Vantage V and Grit X. This has only been fixed in the V2 but this problem had been around for years. Also, there is very little in terms of cycling-specific analytics in Flow.
This tells me that Polar does not see cyclists (nor triathletes for that matter) as their key demographic. Interestingly, the V2 was promoted by a race car driver during the launch event, which I thought was odd given the focus of the watch.
Thank you for the updates and the review on the grit x pro in previous post! Something I miss from your reviews though, is the “comparison” (if I may say) between the watches in certain categories. For instance, I am equally interested in vantage v2 and the forerunner 745 but I have no watch from neither garmin nor from polar. I just have several suunto watches.
So, in terms of training perspective (as a “category”) how would you rate polar vantage v2 and garmin fr745? We know that you use fr 745 because it is your goto thing and it does what you want pretty good, but from a purely training perspective, for instance, according to your opinion, how would you rate those watches?
Thank you sir!
I like the “HR sensor” update for the Unite! Unfortunately, my Ignite still lacks this feature, which would be great for ie Indoor Rides (Zwift, Rouvy, etc). Anyone knows why?
I wouldn’t expect this to come to the original Ignite, given the new Ignite 2 has it and it was sorta a key new feature at launch: link to dcrainmaker.com
For a long time I am a Polar aficionados and I was a very satisfied V800 owner (and early adopter with the Polar presentation tour in France).
The Vantage v1 don’t push me to change but to analyse my use… Was it possible to have a tracker that could sync to my V800 data’s for rest of the day ?
I asked Polar for a tool like this but it was not in their roadmap.
Today I am still expecting to get one day a “day/night tool” that could analyse my rest/recovery time after sport without wearing a 47mm watch at work… Something like the Polar A370 but dedicated to recovery and sleep !
Still waiting.
I don’t understand why they don’t go on this kind of option.
2 or more devices that could communicate, share and read data from PolarFlow would be great no ?
A Grit X Pro when I go for sport and a A370 for calculating recovery the rest of the day… my hope one day
That’s exactly what I want too. Itcs shame to hear they have no interest in it.
I’d be in for both a top end watch and a companion device if they did release such a product. Most of the time I want to wear a full on smartwatch or a nice mechanical one (and some days no watch) and no watch while sleeping. Then have a fitness watch mainly for sport, but also for long weekends, etc.
For a while I tried a few other companies, but having data in disparate places (even within the same company’s ecosystem) was just not that helpful. So I gave up and now am still on an M600 for exercise and a smartwatch/mechanical watch for day use.
I have a somewhat related comment…i own and love the Polar Vantage V2 and have wanted to buy a Polar cycling GPS computer similar to what Wahoo offer with the Roam. It looks Polar made and abandoned the V650 Does anyone know if they will offer anything similar again? The M460 doesn’t appeal to me – I’d rather got for the Roam/Bolt.
Thank you!
Hi,exist firmware update and for the polar ignite?if yes add energy sources?
Hi
Very nice update 👍
I use vantage v2 and love it ❤️
But I and many other user have big problem with decimal numbers of distance. They’re not clearly visible while running. ( I’m not eagle-eyed! )
Please and for God sake talk to Polar support team to change the size of the numbers to ordinary format via next software update.
I don’t understand why Polar persist to keep them small.
And also I missed the white screen in training view from Polar V800.
Thanks 🙏
Agree! I wish that they would have a high contrast option with white background and bold fonts to make the metrics easier to read.
What has helped me is turning on the backlight continuously via the small menu that you can invoke when starting an activity. Battery life is more than sufficient anyway!
cuando sale a la venta el modelo shift?
My Vantage V2 is abysmal at tracking pool swimming. I have an old Garmin Swim that I wear on my other arm to compare. My Iast swim was 1500 yards. The Garmin read correctly at 1500, but the V2 read only 75 yards. I made sure the pool length is correct and updated to the new firmware. I also have a Vantage M, V and a Titan and the pool swimming is awful on those as well. I do not do flip turns, but I make sure to give a healthy push off the wall with every turn. Is it something with my mechanics? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated?
My experience is similar to yours in relation to pool swim accuracy. I do not have a solution unfortunately. This has been a problem since the original Vantage as you point out and I am also not hopeful that this will ever get fixed merely due to the fact that I suspect that not many people track their swims using a Polar device. I only see Garmins and Apple Watches in the pool.
Same thing to me… sometimes it works well sometimes not, more not :-(
But another question – what would you do, if you want to go in a pool which is shorter then 20m??? ;-)
Regards from Germany
Marc
I reached out to polar about the swim tracking issue and here is their response.
Hi Anthony,
Thank you for contacting Polar Customer Care. I am sorry to hear about this issue. Just like all of our features, swimming metrics are based on an algorithm, which always requires carefully set specifications and limits. This is why the algorithm cannot always be applied correctly, so please read the following carefully to learn what the prerequisites for successful swimming metrics calculation are.
We also recommend that you read the swimming metrics feature description included in the user manual of your Polar product. As an example, here is a link to the Polar Vantage V2 user manual: link to support.polar.com
These instructions apply to all Polar watches that support pool swimming metrics calculation from the wrist.
How does the watch recognize swimming?
Pool swimming metrics are based on the fact that the watch recognizes hand movements using the built-in accelerometer.
Settings
A successful swimming metrics calculation requires the following information: pool length and handedness (whether the watch is worn on the left or right wrist).
Wearing the watch
Wear the watch so that the display is on the same side as the back of your hand. Make sure that the wristband is tight enough to stop the watch from moving during the swim.
Which sport profile should I select?
You can select either the Pool swimming or Swimming sport profile.
Whichever profile you choose, we recommend that you set the distance-based automatic laps off in the sport profile settings because they do not work reliably in pool swimming. Instead, you should utilize manual laps for this purpose.
Logic behind the swimming metrics calculation
The logic behind the swimming metrics calculation is based on two factors: Firstly, the watch has to recognize the swimming style as one of the four supported swimming styles mentioned in the user manual. Secondly, the watch has to recognize your turns. Turns will not be taken into account in the calculation before the swimming style has been successfully recognized.
To sum up, both the swimming style and turns need to be recognized correctly in order for the distance to be measured correctly. Every time you turn, one pool length gets added to the total distance swam.
If the watch does not recognize the swimming style correctly, it is unable to save the style or calculate the distance.
The swimming metrics calculation utilizes the time data available from correctly measured pool lengths to correct any possible mistakes in the distance calculation.
Rest time
Note that when you stop, there is a small delay before the rest time appears on the watch display.
What does the calculation not recognize?
The calculation does not recognize drills (for example, mere kicks without hands movements, or swimming with a pull buoy).
Which factors are involved if the calculation is unsuccessful?
Any deviations while you are swimming, such as dodging other swimmers or taking a look the watch display might mess up the style recognition and thereby cause unreliable readings.
You should not turn by swimming as the watch cannot recognize the turn in that case. Remember this for example when you have two lanes at your disposal or otherwise would like to turn by swimming.
The important thing about the turn is that you clearly change direction back to where you came from. Otherwise it is less relevant how you actually turn.
The swimming metrics calculation has been developed and tested based on the extensive and diverse data that we have collected, however, despite all this, the calculation is unfortunately unable to recognize every swimmer’s swimming style. We acknowledge this issue and are working hard to improve the calculation.
Tips
Make sure you have the latest firmware update installed on your watch. Check your firmware version by going to Settings > General settings > About your product > find the firmware version. Whenever there is a new firmware version available for your watch, you will be prompted to install the update either by the FlowSync software on your computer or by the Flow mobile app.
Do not start the training session recording until you are in the pool, however, do avoid pushing the buttons under water.
When you finish your training session, do not stop the session recording on your watch straight away but instead wait a while so that very last pool length will be included in the calculation and appears on the display.
If you see faulty measurements after swimming the first couple of hundred meters, we recommend that you stop the recording and start a fresh recording at the end of the pool.
Switching wrists might also help recognize your swimming style. For example, in freestyle your breathing might affect your hand movements.
You can also restart your watch or do a factory reset if you suspect that the firmware is not working correctly for some reason.
Thank you for choosing Polar!
Thanks for sharing this. This is greatly appreciated. I have been sent a similar note by support a long time ago. These tips are useful for all swimmers with all watches and will help you to get more accurate readings in general.
When go sent a similar response from Polar after sharing data that showed that the watch did not pick up the majority of my swim (it showed 45 min of my my 60 min continuous swim as resting time), I was very disappointed that they basically attributed what is clearly a bug to user error.
I think that the elephant in the room is that the pool swim tracking in Polar watches is not very robust AND that it is not a priority for Polar to fix this. For example, I have never had any major inaccuracies with my 945, while this has been an recurring problem with Polar. Sometimes the Poar data is OK but other times, the data does not even remotely resemble what I did.
It’s really a shame. I like the polar watch for running, but their swim tracking is useless. Looks like I’ll be wearing 2 watches for swimming for the foreseeable future.
After update for VV2 3.0.16 INSTANT PACE and INSTANT POWER IS WORST then previous firmware version. Mainly in forrest. It is bad like with VV1. Do you have the same issue?
With these updates, how much closer does that put the Vantage V2 to the Garmin 745?
Minus the Garmin ecosystem, is this now a comparable feature set?
I have been told by Polar “As I have already mentioned, our central team replied that testing a watch from different wrists or from the same wrist at the same time may not give reliable results” Is this your experience while making comparison tests between different watch brands ?
I own a polar vantage v1 and a Polar vantage v2 and when wearing them on my wrist along with a third measuring device H10 connected to my mobile the Polar V2 seems to be erratic with the measurements giving long periods of very low HRs (more than 15 bps). Has anybody noticed this ?
Hello Ray.
I posted this in Reddit as well:
I am using Polar products since 20 years ago and I just made an upgrade switching from a VV to a VV2.
I did the required update and syncs so the watch is ready to be used. I imported some GPX tracks that I successfull used in my VV for my bike rides. I have routes 80-110 miles long and with min altitude 1300 ft and max altitude 8500 ft (Yup… I am an avid climber).
The result is a disaster. Once imported to the VV2, it shows uncorrect distance and altitudes.
One example. I just uploaded a roundtrip route:
REAL DATA
length = 60 miles
max altitude = 8038 ft
min altitude = 3805 ft
Once I open the route in the VV2 as preview I get the correct shape of path BUT
length = 8,7 miles
max altitude = 4271 ft
min altitude = -15 ft (yes…negative!)
Additional notes:
I made calibration of altimeter before and after importing the routes
I tried GPX files made with different softwares (Alltrails, Garmin connect, Komoot). The problem occurs no matter which software I used to create the route.
Tried this on other VV2 of a friend of mine – > same issues.
Wrote to Polar more than 1 month ago and still no reply.
this is the roundtrip altitude profile I get from AllTrails and Garmin connect. Numbers are pretty similar using both softwares.
When I import the GPX file to VV2 I get:
correct shape of roundtrip but length is 57,68 miles VS 61,11 miles
correct shape of altitude profile but on right side of VV2 display I get -16 ft (min) and +4271 ft (max). So in this case not even the total delta is OK. What makes sense is that delta between -16 and +4271 is more or less the delta of the last DESCENT only….but I don’t think that to get numbers like this is very helpful to manage your strain during such a ride.
But problem are bigger when a 60 miles route become 8,7 miles….There’s something definetly wrong….
I am really disappointed….
Does anyone have / had the same issue?
Thank you in advance!
Hi, any updates regarding the V3 release?
I bought a Polar Vantage V2 Swift Edition in March 2022 because I wanted to try Polar after 6 years of Garmin (then Fr 945). But after using it for a few days, I was just disappointed, so I put the watch away. Now, even though there is no new model, I am experiencing a massive price drop so it almost makes no sense to sell it. What’s your opinion? Does it make sense to wait for major software updates, or has Polar basically given up on Garmin in terms of usability. At the moment I think the measurement accuracy – which depends on the H10 anyway – and the Polar Flow app are no longer reasons to buy a Polar for triathlon. Thank you for your opinion
Hi Akos-
Unfortunately, I don’t see any scenario where the V2 magically becomes more competitive overnight compared to Garmin’s newer products. It’s very hard for Polar to compete in this realm, at least on features alone, or features+accuracy (which they lag in both today).
Sorry!
Thank you Ray!! Have a happy new year. Best regards, Akos