Heads up! Here’s your massive list of sports tech deals! This includes the Garmin Forerunner 965 for just $499, Garmin Epix for $449, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 Black Titanium for $735, the GoPro Hero 12 Black for $299, and plenty more! Go check out the full list here!
I’m DC RAINMAKER…
Here’s how to save!
Wanna save some cash and support the site? These companies help support the site! With Backcountry.com or Competitive Cyclist with either the coupon code DCRAINMAKER for first time users saving 15% on applicable products.
You can also pick-up tons of gear at REI via these links, which is a long-time supporter as well:
Alternatively, for everything else on the planet, simply buy your goods from Amazon via the link below and I get a tiny bit back as an Amazon Associate. No cost to you, easy as pie!
You can use the above link for any Amazon country and it (should) automatically redirect to your local Amazon site.
-
Check out my weekly podcast - with DesFit, which is packed with both gadget and non-gadget goodness!
-
5 Easy Steps To The Site
1
In Depth Product Reviews
You probably stumbled upon here looking for a review of a sports gadget. If you’re trying to decide which unit to buy – check out my in-depth reviews section. Some reviews are over 60 pages long when printed out, with hundreds of photos! I aim to leave no stone unturned.
2
Read My Sports Gadget Recommendations.
Here’s my most recent GPS watch guide here, and cycling GPS computers here. Plus there are smart trainers here, all in these guides cover almost every category of sports gadgets out there. Looking for the equipment I use day-to-day? I also just put together my complete ‘Gear I Use’ equipment list, from swim to bike to run and everything in between (plus a few extra things). And to compliment that, here’s The Girl’s (my wife’s) list. Enjoy, and thanks for stopping by!
3
Have some fun in the travel section.
I travel a fair bit, both for work and for fun. Here’s a bunch of random trip reports and daily trip-logs that I’ve put together and posted. I’ve sorted it all by world geography, in an attempt to make it easy to figure out where I’ve been.
4
My Photography Gear: The Cameras/Drones/Action Cams I Use Daily
The most common question I receive outside of the “what’s the best GPS watch for me” variant, are photography-esq based. So in efforts to combat the amount of emails I need to sort through on a daily basis, I’ve complied this “My Photography Gear” post for your curious minds (including drones & action cams!)! It’s a nice break from the day-to-day sports-tech talk, and I hope you get something out of it!
5
The Swim/Bike/Run Gear I Use List
Many readers stumble into my website in search of information on the latest and greatest sports tech products. But at the end of the day, you might just be wondering “What does Ray use when not testing new products?”. So here is the most up to date list of products I like and fit the bill for me and my training needs best! DC Rainmaker 2023 swim, bike, run, and general gear list. But wait, are you a female and feel like these things might not apply to you? If that’s the case (but certainly not saying my choices aren’t good for women), and you just want to see a different gear junkies “picks”, check out The Girl’s Gear Guide too.
I do like the way you try and do your session where ever you are… if I’m on holiday I just try and run. But that said I only really travel every other year. Now if I’m required to pop away for a day or to work, I just do hills hills and more hills. Now what kind of hill runner would I be if I had your job?
Based on your results/PRs, isn’t 1:27/400m slow for you?
Potentially, we’ll see. It was the first iteration of this workout, so it was mostly to see where things stand and adjust accordingly for next time.
1:27 for 400 meters going up hill with a gradient of 2.5% is not slow comparing to your 800 Intervals you published not long ago.
Hey Ray, nice to see you have visited Holland again. Beeing just started on the Garmin connect front, from which program is the ft/rpm/bpm etc combined graph taken? Greetz!
To the best of my knowledge that graph is taken from the fullscreen activity view of the new Trainingpeaks beta (link to app.trainingpeaks.com).
Yup, that’s correct. Actually two different apps at work here:
Combo graph: Training Peaks Beta
Splits window: Garmin Connect
Hey Ray, could you please give some more information on what kind of cadence drills you did / normally do? Thanks a lot and take care!
Worth a note, that a GPS can not measure circles or turns very well unless it has a measuring interval of >10 times the moving speed per second. This is usually way outside the measurable error of GPS. Therefor use the timer/stopwatch for perfectly measured tracks (which are usually certified).
Nice to see you enjoy the Dutch summer too Ray :D . (yesterday we had the coldest 19th of august since 90 years).
So when you aren’t testing a watch, and just recording for your own stats/info, do you always use the garmin fenix? Or do you mix it up with the 620 and ambit?
I was testing some stuff with the Fenix2, otherwise I normally use the FR620 if I’m not testing something.
I saw this run show up on Strava from your Fenix 2, but it didn’t have any splits. Did you actually do the splits with a different watch? Or is this a GC->Strava issue?
I think it’s a Fenix2 GC > Strava thing. :-/
With the fenix2 it seems the Uploader in Strava doesn’t catch the “Laps”. If you export from GC (TCX) and upload manually it will… This might be different with the 620…?
Yeah. There’s some issues in general with the Fenix2 and Strava. Some are Strava’s fault, and some are Garmin’s fault. For example, Strava can’t parse the Fenix2 multisport workout files. Meanwhile, TrainingPeaks can. That seems like a Strava thing (likely).
On the flip side, the splits thing seems more Garmin focused since it works just fine on the FR620 but not on the Fenix2. I suspect this may be a team issue where the fact that their come from entirely different divisions. I remember bringing it up many moons ago, but it sorta faded off.
Hi Ray, may I ask what are you testing with the fenix2 ?
I just bought this watch based on your review and it’s spot on :D
Just stuff… ;)
Ahhh, crossing my fingers that it is a daily activity tracker function. (Despite the fact that you have stated previously that the hardware does not work in a low power mode for this)
Start whistling if this is possibly correct.
Strava has alway had trouble with multisport workouts, at least as captured by my 910xt. I don’t think that’s a Fenix2 problem.
Actually “recently” strava has been happily accepting my 910XT multisport workouts. (I even went back and re-uploaded some old ones that it didn’t handle so gracefully in the past.)
I hope they get that fixed soon since I just ordered the Fenix 2 to replace my FR305….
I decided to start over with running and started a couch to 10k program (even though I can run a 5k no problem and can technically run a 10k already) so I can focus on form and build up muscles properly. And of course, these programs are all interval based. I guess the most important thing is that they will show up on Garmin Connect, but still it would be nice if they showed up everywhere. Do laps show up on other sites, like TrainingPeaks?
Yes, no problems with laps on TP from the Fenix2.
Not having a track to run on in my area, this post comes in very handy and just at the right time!
Also when running in the woods I always get the feeling that my Polar RC3 is getting pretty inaccurate (based on feel) or is it just my imagination.What’s your experience with that and is there a way to validate a .gpx file afterwards?
One thing I often do is if I am not entirely sure of an exact distance is run for a time not a distance.
So say you normally average 75 for 10×400 with 60s just do 10x75s with 60s instead.
The training effect will be the same and another advantage of this is that you could just do and out and back on a trail and see more of your surroundings.
Of, if you wanted to run the same section each time, you could of course just do that as well.
I know those are arrows on your chart, but they sure look like you’re flipping the bird to your intervals! :-)
Some Garmins feature Autolap by marked position (910xt). It works within a couple of strides from the marked position on the oval.
Thank you for the interesting & motivating post.
“So instead I just did lap pacing. For that I use the lap time option on my watch to pace by.”
What option is that? On my FR610 for workouts I can set a range and it will buzz if I’m out ‘or back in) of that range and it can get a tad annoying.
Sorry, “Lap Pace”. But either way, it tells me the average pace for that lap. I’m not using alerts with it, just as a visual reminder.
Wouldn’t a foot pod help with getting a more accurate distance in the woods?
It depends. If the trail was full of switchbacks, then definitely. But for straightaways like I had, GPS is a better ‘long term’ bet. By that I mean that had I calibrated the footpod correctly before hand, then sure, the footpod would have been quite good. But since I don’t even bother with a footpod anymore*, I’d have to add it and calibrate it.
*I don’t use it these days since I can get cadence from the wrist for all modern watches that I use, and if indoors, then I’ll put it on there. But I try to avoid treadmills as much as possible this time of year.
While there is no question calibration would improve accuracy, isn’t the footpod more consistent than GPS?
In most cases, yes. Though, for me I don’t tend to see too many issues with pace stability (at least on my units), so it doesn’t bother me much.
I was thinking about distance mainly, since you were concerned with having the intervals all the same length, a pod seemed a better choice to me, I see all kind of wandering about from GPS when I’m doing laps or taking a look at somebody else’s (track races are especially ugly)
My solution would be to calibrate the pod and leave in on the shoe, but I suppose with all of your traveling a pod is just another extra part waiting to act up.
During the winter, I do a lot of running at an indoor track, and ditched the foot pod when I got my FR 220. I then had instances of the internal accelerometer malfunctioning and losing a lap or more of distance when recording my runs. Have you seen that with the 620? I went back to the foot pod and haven’t checked whether the issue has been fixed in the updates since.
To some degree you’ll see wide variations in pace using WDR (Wrist based detection). Sometimes it’s very close, othertimes not. For tonight on the treadmill the distance reported was 7.5mi (watch) to 6.5mi (treadmill).
I assume you rushed home and made each direction and new Strava segment? KOM for .25miles in each direction in the middle of nowhere….I think that KOM could last for a very long time.
Hmmm…very tempting!
If you plan to workout in Fontainebleau, let me know :-)
Hi Ray,
Funny too see dutch pics on your site. If you want a beach(the hague) run or need a track let me know :-). Interesting stuff keep it up as i always struggle a bit when i am on vacation. I use the wahoo app a tracker and my suunto to keep an eye on balance and my run. Thanks again for sharing!
Hi Ray – did you run in college? You are quite quick. You podium often in your tri’s with I imagine a strong bike and run ?
I’m averaging 7:15 min/mi for my 1/2 marathon run pace but I’m having a hard time breaking through that plateau.
No running in college (mostly because I didn’t go to college). I ran cross country my freshman year of high school, but then quickly realized that was a horribly painful way to spend one’s afternoon…and then didn’t run again for about 10 years (as in, no running at all).
For me, the biggest shifts in my running came at two points. The first was the introduction of intervals into my schedule. And the second was when I got onboard with a coach that put some thought and planning into it.
Ray, have you ever try dynamic training plans offered by 2peak.com and the like? Whats your thoughts on dynamic training plans?
No, I haven’t played with them unfortunately.
Ray – Interestingly, I had a similar interval workout where the middle portion comprised: 4 sets of 3mins at 6:30mins/mile followed by 5mins at 5:40mins/mile. With no local track, my challenge was finding the flattest piece of tarmac, so I ended up running slightly uphill for a couple and downhill for the other two.
Now (I have asked this before :-)), I wonder if someone will ever come up with a Google Maps based tool where you specify an area, length of road and elevation change preferred. The tool would then highlight all roads/trails that meet your requirements.
This would make it much easier for those of us who are not close to tracks but need a flat road/trail for speed workouts or hilly ones for hill repeats!
That’d definitely be cool. They actually just introduced a portion of that into Google Maps that allows you to select a bike routing based on whether there is (or isn’t significant elevation in it).
I have seen what Google has done for bike routing, maybe it is a start of something along the lines of what I am looking for.
If there any Google employees (or anyone looking to ideas for a runners elevation app) reading this…please take up the challenge :-)
Happy trails..and many thanks for a wonderful blog
link to google-latlong.blogspot.com.au
Ray, I love that you titled this as a “precise” workout. I work in an industry where the differences between accuracy and precision (and resolution) are crucial, and yet I see professionals miss such nuances all of the time! Although, I can’t say I expected anything less of you. :-P
:)
Hi Ray. Re 100m splits on the running track. I use my Finis Tempo Trainer from my swimming kit bag for this… It evens comes with a belt clip you can use to clip it onto your running shorts.
The strange thing is, my running pace splits for 100m on the track are almost identical to my swimming 25m splits….
Cheers, Andy
Hi Ray, interesting to see you trust the 100m marks from road construction workers better than a GPS watch. I might be interesting what equipment they use to measure the length of a road when building it.
You didn’t choose the best place to run by the way :). Please drop me a line next time you have to visit Apeldoorn. I live there and am part of a very active triathlon community. There are different trainings virtually every day.
I wasn’t using the construction markers. I made my own markers using GPS. :)
Hi Ray!
Thank you for you posts and reviews :)
When you log this track, your Fenix2 was using the firmware version 3.7 or a 3.8 beta?
Garmin did an update (3.8) for the Fenix2 and some people says that improves the gps accuracy.
I’m curious to know if this is the best accuracy of this little impresive device!
It was 3.8 beta.
Nice GPS accuracy. Not.
Care to expand? Seriously.
Ray, I’ve noticed when running on a track my forerunner 220 seriously overestimates distance–probably 0.15 miles extra per 400m lap on tracks out in the open without trees or other sources of satellite interference. Any idea why this might be? It underestimates most other distances especially under tree cover and on routes with lots of turns, which I understand, but would have expected it to underestimate track curves as well.
So it’s showing .40 miles instead of .25 miles for each 400m set? Usually I get about .24 to .26. You might want to try resetting the unit if it’s at .40 miles instead.
So 0.15/400m is an exaggeration, but if you look at the workout below you see widely differing paces for 1200m repeats run in times only a couple seconds apart:
I’ll have to look into resetting. Thx!
Link to mentioned work: link to strava.com